Table 1 Overview and order of statistical analyses, including observations per data set.
From: Exploring the drivers of inter- and intraspecific differences in prosociality in four parrot species
# | Test | Data set | Response variable | Predictors | Random effect | Offset | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Are all species motivated to participate?A | |||||||
1 | GLMM (binomial) | Species-level (AG: 120 obs, BHM: 105 obs, E: 75 obs, G: 180 obs) | Landings on receiver perch in motivational trials/total trials (all sessions) | Sex + Condition * Session | (1+Conditon + Session|Bird ID) | – | |
Do parrots sustain food provisions across sessions? | |||||||
2 | GLM (poisson) | Species-level (AG: 5 obs, BHM: 5 obs, E: 5 obs, G: 5 obs) | Food provided (all sessions) | Session | – | – | |
Do they land according to task’s contingencies?A | |||||||
3 | Chisq-Tests (individual level) | All birds tested in Phase IV & V (32 obs) | Individual number of landings on provider perch in Phase IV & V (S4 & S5) | – | – | – | |
What explains species differences? | |||||||
4 | GLM (zero-inflated, negative binomial) | All birds tested in Phase IV & V (32 obs) | Sum landings on provider perch in test condition (Phase IV—S4 & S5) | Cooperation + Nesting + Social Tolerance | – | Trial number | |
To whom do birds provide food? | |||||||
5 | GLMM (negative binomial) | Dyadic-level (N = 424 obs) | Food provided in S4&5 | Species * (Kinship + Sex + Affiliation) | (1|Provider: Dyad) + (1 + Affiliation|Provider) | Trial number |