Table 5 Discriminant validity analysis.

From: An integrated SOR and SCT model approach to exploring chinese public perception of autonomous vehicles

Discriminant validity using HTMT (Heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations)

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

1. Subjective Norm

      

2. Trust

0.760

     

3. Mass Media

0.478

0.510

    

4. Electronic Word-of-Mouth

0.303

0.363

0.428

   

5. Self-efficacy

0.654

0.665

0.660

0.292

  

6. Adoption Intention

0.651

0.758

0.582

0.273

0.693

 

Discriminant validity of Fornell & Larcker (1981)

1. Subjective Norm

0.906

     

2. Trust

0.713

0.861

    

3. Mass Media

0.409

0.434

0.826

   

4. Electronic Word-of-Mouth

0.335

0.382

0.353

0.743

  

5. Self-efficacy

0.608

0.614

0.541

0.289

0.836

 

6. Adoption Intention

0.608

0.703

0.487

0.292

0.630

0.861

  1. Note: The diagonal is the square root of the AVE-value.
Back to article page