Table 6 Comparative analysis of related works with the proposed model based on various handwritten datasets for PD prediction.

From: Design of a deep fusion model for early Parkinson’s disease prediction using handwritten image analysis

Related works

Type of handwritten dataset

Dataset size

Models applied

Accuracy (%)

5

Parkinson’s disease handwriting database (PaHaW) (spiral images)

75

Ensemble classifier

74.76

23

Real-time dataset (word, syllable, or sentence)

75

SVM, Adaboost, KNN

81.3

24

NewHandPD dataset (spiral and meander images)

92

CNN

95.83

27

Not mentioned (handwriting dynamics)

66

SVM-RBF

83

4

Parkinson’s disease spiral drawings using digitized graphics tablet dataset (spiral images)

77

CNN

96.5

59

Publicly available UCI ML repository (spiral images)

80

Adaboost

96.02

39

Innovation and technology assessment of the Federal University (spiral and wave images)

204

DenseNet201 and VGG16

94% and 90%

40

Publicly available dataset (spiral and wave images)

469

VGG19-INC

98.45

60

PaHaW dataset (spiral images)

166

CC-Net

89.3

61

Publicly available dataset (spiral and wave images)

204

CNN

93.3

62

Publicly available dataset (spiral and wave images)

960

RF, KNN, SVM

83.1

35

NewHandPD dataset (circle, meander, and spiral images)

279

ResNet, VGG19, InceptionV3, and KNN

95

63

Publicly available UCI ML repository (spiral images)

77

Restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM) pipelined with multi-layer perceptron model classifier

95.32

55

K Scott Mader dataset (spiral and wave images)

3264

Modified Mobile Net V2

97.7

64

K Scott Mader dataset-augmented (spiral and wave images)

3264

EfficientNetB2

96.4

RGG-Net

K Scott Mader dataset-augmented (spiral and wave images)

3264

ResNet-50 and GoogLeNet

99.12