Table 5 Technical efficiency in 29 provinces based on Meta-frontier.

From: Efficiency evaluation of the impact of energy poverty on sustainable development of water resources

Group

Province

MTE

GTE

TGR

With exogenous variable

Without exogenous variable

With exogenous variable

Without exogenous variable

With exogenous variable

Without exogenous variable

East region

Shanghai

0.26

0.26

0.68

0.68

0.38

0.38

Shandong

0.14

0.12

0.25

0.12

0.57

0.98

Tianjin

0.94

0.94

1

1

0.94

0.94

Beijing

1

1

1

1

1

1

Jilin

0.76

0.48

0.91

0.53

0.84

0.92

Jiangsu

0.17

0.17

0.52

0.34

0.34

0.5

Hebei

0.24

0.22

0.93

0.83

0.26

0.26

Hainan

0.89

0.89

0.9

0.9

1

1

Zhejiang

0.33

0.24

0.35

0.25

0.94

0.96

Heilongjiang

0.52

0.26

0.7

0.31

0.74

0.87

Fujian

0.55

0.53

0.66

0.6

0.83

0.89

Guangdong

0.47

0.26

0.48

0.3

0.99

0.88

Liaoning

0.53

0.49

0.64

0.62

0.83

0.8

East region Mean

0.52

0.45

0.69

0.57

0.74

0.8

Central region

Shanxi

0.15

0.14

1

1

0.15

0.14

Anhui

0.25

0.23

0.8

0.8

0.31

0.28

Jiangxi

0.44

0.44

1

1

0.44

0.44

Henan

0.19

0.17

1

1

0.19

0.17

Hubei

0.25

0.23

1

1

0.25

0.23

Hunan

0.55

0.48

1

1

0.55

0.48

Central region Mean

0.3

0.28

0.97

0.97

0.31

0.29

West region

Yunan

0.6

0.46

0.72

0.72

0.82

0.64

Sichuan

0.18

0.16

0.43

0.43

0.41

0.38

Gansu

0.54

0.48

0.84

0.84

0.63

0.57

Ningxia

1

1

1

1

1

1

Qinahai

1

1

1

1

1

1

Chongqing

0.58

0.57

1

1

0.58

0.57

Inner Mongolia

0.67

0.6

0.67

0.67

1

0.89

Guangxi

0.38

0.37

0.93

0.93

0.4

0.39

Guizhou

0.63

0.57

0.94

0.87

0.68

0.65

Shaanxi

0.47

0.35

0.52

0.52

0.9

0.67

West region Mean

0.6

0.56

0.81

0.8

0.74

0.68

China provincial Mean

0.47

0.45

0.82

0.74

0.6

0.65