Table 1 Summary of literature review on load forecasting techniques.
Author(s) | Model(s) used | Dataset | Findings | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|
ARIMA, Linear Regression | Traditional load forecasting data | Simple and easy to visualize, but struggle with non-linear data and complex renewable patterns | Ineffective with non-linear data and complex patterns from renewable sources | |
Mystakidis et al.12 | Linear Regression, Decision Trees | Energy prediction datasets | Models are interpretable and applicable to both regression and classification tasks | Prone to overfitting and less reliable for renewable variability |
Gellert et al.13 | Random Forest | Large energy datasets | Enhances prediction accuracy by combining multiple decision trees, reducing overfitting | Computationally intensive, especially when applied to large datasets, compared to simpler base models such as linear regression or decision trees |
Chen and Guestrin15 | XGBoost | Large, complex forecasting datasets | Superior speed and accuracy for complex forecasting tasks, efficient and scalable | Sensitive to hyperparameter settings and can be computationally demanding, especially when compared to simpler base models such as linear regression |
Wang et al. 16 | Support Vector Machines (SVM) | Energy forecasting data | Applicable to both linear and non-linear data for regression and classification tasks | Sensitive to parameter selection can be computationally heavy |
Quinlan17 | Decision Trees | Energy datasets | Straightforward and interpretable | Susceptible to overfitting, especially in complex datasets |
Breiman18 | Random Forest | Energy datasets | More stable and accurate predictions by aggregating multiple decision trees | Requires considerable computational resources |
Cortes and Vapnik19 | SVM | Diverse data structures in load forecasting | Robust in both classification and regression tasks | Computational complexity increases with dataset size |
Al Arafat et al.21 | Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) | Forecasting datasets | Captures intricate, non-linear interactions; adaptable across forecasting applications | Computationally intensive; requires careful tuning to avoid overfitting |
Chen et al.23 | ML models with weather data integration | Energy datasets with external factors | Incorporating weather data improves forecasting accuracy | Requires accurate external data; forecasting accuracy depends on data quality |
Li et al.24 | LSTM | Historical wind speed data (China) | Effective for short-term wind speed forecasting; captures long-term dependencies and handles time-series data well | Single-region data; lacks cross-regional validation |