Table 10 Influence of different values of k on MULTIMOORA \(C_pLD_yFDPWA\).
\(C_pLD_yFDPWA\) | k valus | Ranking of RS System | Ranking of MF System | Multimoora Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|
 | 1 | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) |
 | 2 | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) |
 | 3 | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) |
 | 5 | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) |
 | 7 | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) |
 | 10 | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) |
 | 15 | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) |
 | 20 | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) | \(\beth _4> \beth _1> \beth _3 > \beth _2\) |