Table 5 Comparisons between LD and variants.

From: A learning-driven algorithm for maintenance team and UAV collaboration in restoring power network

No.

 

ranIni

LD1

LD2

LD3

LD

1

Median

3652.951

3626.563

3714.486

3617.61

3635.633

 

Best

3511.160

3556.825

3567.599

3503.777

3472.411

 

p-value

0.756

0.535

0.000

0.261

 

2

Median

4059.062

3864.297

3974.453

3823.794

3794.133

 

Best

3919.772

3797.943

3865.254

3736.721

3719.673

 

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.003

 

3

Median

4336.542

3947.960

4028.793

3895.469

3993.715

 

Best

4006.295

3873.192

3953.613

3845.324

3903.387

 

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.017

0.000

 

4

Median

4267.077

3933.067

4045.668

3978.882

3938.08

 

Best

4048.271

3873.1000

3974.905

3919.278

3841.397

 

p-value

0.000

0.953

0.000

0.002

 

5

Median

4234.380

3943.885

4040.579

3919.622

3937.819

 

Best

4051.286

3879.804

3971.933

3819.611

3871.777

 

p-value

0.000

0.605

0.000

0.011

 

6

Median

4306.333

4017.285

4055.758

3935.474

3999.392

 

Best

4209.205

3950.106

3931.797

3857.965

3937.58

 

p-value

0.000

0.045

0.000

0.000

 

7

Median

4398.411

3974.568

4000.518

3993.666

3934.849

 

Best

4078.774

3090.334

3925.186

3875.523

3838.707

 

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

 

8

Median

5014.481

4342.686

4457.377

4350.458

4293.426

 

Best

4621.818

4271.349

4349.453

4286.48

4234.835

 

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

 

9

Median

5052.659

4731.882

4857.880

4796.699

4684.492

 

Best

4622.411

4646.187

4736.466

4696.486

4639.606

 

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

 

10

Median

6132.210

4855.675

4906.735

4868.75

4817.163

 

Best

4917.917

4752.401

4773.013

4768.688

4736.477

 

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

 

11

Median

8091.476

5550.818

5558.691

5540.283

5491.885

 

Best

6063.963

5437.611

5456.446

5433.636

5403.928

 

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

 

12

Median

8943.308

5359.879

5438.914

5407.468

5304.532

 

Best

6024.643

5290.019

5361.240

5326.514

5223.005

 

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

 

13

Median

7169.377

5704.072

5746.811

5745.403

5653.479

 

Best

6768.126

5647.969

5603.470

5673.746

5573.543

 

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

 

14

Median

10895.176

6160.819

6179.244

6196.82

6122.147

 

Best

7360.046

6084.344

6099.794

6079.049

6035.797

 

p-value

0.000

0.008

0.000

0.000

 

15

Median

10125.798

6658.038

6676.651

6684.948

6630.601

 

Best

8369.964

6589.335

6614.409

6598.365

6512.799

 

p-value

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.000

 
  1. Italics indicate that the performance of our proposed algorithm are statistically different from those of comparied algorithm.