Table 4 The comparison of PV constraints of Cs2TiCl6-based PSCs.
Type | Device structure | VOC (V) | JSC (mA/cm2) | FF (%) | PCE (%) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FTO/TiO2/Cs2TiBr6/P3HT//Au | 0.89 | 3.87 | 59.5 | 2.15 | |
1 | FTO/SnO2/Cs2TiBr6/MoO3/Au | 1.53 | 8.66 | 86.45 | 11.49 | |
2 | FTO/TiO2/Cs2TiBr6/NiO/Au | 1.12 | 10.25 | 73.59 | 8.51 | |
2 | FTO/TiO2/Cs2TiBr6/NiCo2O4/Au | 1.34 | 17.67 | 82.51 | 19.30 | |
2 | ITO/NPB/Cs2TiBr6/PCBM/BCP/Ag | 1.29 | 16.66 | 78.1 | 16.85 | |
2 | FTO/TiO2/Cs2TiBr6/CuSCN/Ag | 1.90 | 19.88 | 35.95 | 13.57 | |
2 | FTO/TiO2/Cs2TiCl6/CuSCN/Ag | 1.98 | 8.23 | 33.73 | 5.50 | |
2 | FTO/CdS/Cs2TiCl6/CdTe/Au | 1.188 | 17.83 | 89.51 | 18.15 | a |
2 | FTO/Nb2O5/Cs2TiCl6/CdTe/Au | 1.186 | 15.76 | 89.43 | 16.07 | a |
2 | FTO/ZnSe/Cs2TiCl6/CdTe/Au | 1.183 | 17.85 | 89.78 | 18.03 | a |
2 | FTO/MZO/Cs2TiCl6/CdTe/Au | 1.923 | 17.94 | 88.98 | 18.12 | a |
