Table 6 Variation of Fill factor (FF) and efficiency (PCE) with time using DSC-DQ Method based on RSK at \(\begin{gathered} L = 600{\text{ nm, L}}_{E} {\text{ = 100 nm, L}}_{H} {\text{ = 200 nm, }}\tau_{E} {\text{ = 3 ns, }}\tau_{H} {\text{ = 300 ns D}}_{E} = 10^{ - 5} {\text{m}}^{2} s^{ - 1} ,{\text{ D}}_{H} = 10^{ - 6} {\text{ m}}^{2} s^{ - 1} , \hfill \\ {\text{ V}}_{oc} { = 1}{\text{.16 V, 2M + 1 = 3, }}D_{I} { = }10^{ - 17} {\text{ m}}^{2} s^{ - 1} {, }T = 300 \, k, \, \sigma = 2.25h_{z} , \, \vartriangle T = 1{\text{ s, }}\ell { = 8}, \, \alpha = 1, \, \beta = 2 \hfill \\ \end{gathered}\).

From: Fractional differential quadrature method for modeling composite halide perovskite solar cells

Time (\(s\))

FF %

PCE %

No. of blocks

No. of blocks

1

5

7

Experiment30,32,60

1

5

7

Experiment30,32,60

0

45.444

45.301

45.276

45.27

14.622

14.561

14.455

14.45

50

60.435

60.311

60.223

60.2

17.266

17.109

17.001

17

100

60.98

60.845

60.784

60.78

17.345

17.261

17.201

17.2

150

65.379

65.245

65.222

65.2

18.187

18.100

18.005

18

200

66.379

66.322

66.308

66.3

18.721

18.655

18.623

18.6

250

67.138

67.015

67.008

67

19.199

19.087

19.004

19

300

68.612

68.525

68.500

68.5

19.487

19.328

19.311

19.3

350

70.329

70.222

70.205

70.2

19.867

19.820

19.807

19.8

400

70.788

70.725

70.712

70.7

20.125

20.074

20.052

20.05

Performance time

7.1 (second) – over no. of blocks \(\ge 7\)