Table 6 Variation of Fill factor (FF) and efficiency (PCE) with time using DSC-DQ Method based on RSK at \(\begin{gathered} L = 600{\text{ nm, L}}_{E} {\text{ = 100 nm, L}}_{H} {\text{ = 200 nm, }}\tau_{E} {\text{ = 3 ns, }}\tau_{H} {\text{ = 300 ns D}}_{E} = 10^{ - 5} {\text{m}}^{2} s^{ - 1} ,{\text{ D}}_{H} = 10^{ - 6} {\text{ m}}^{2} s^{ - 1} , \hfill \\ {\text{ V}}_{oc} { = 1}{\text{.16 V, 2M + 1 = 3, }}D_{I} { = }10^{ - 17} {\text{ m}}^{2} s^{ - 1} {, }T = 300 \, k, \, \sigma = 2.25h_{z} , \, \vartriangle T = 1{\text{ s, }}\ell { = 8}, \, \alpha = 1, \, \beta = 2 \hfill \\ \end{gathered}\).
From: Fractional differential quadrature method for modeling composite halide perovskite solar cells
Time (\(s\)) | FF % | PCE % | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of blocks | No. of blocks | |||||||
1 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 7 | |||
0 | 45.444 | 45.301 | 45.276 | 45.27 | 14.622 | 14.561 | 14.455 | 14.45 |
50 | 60.435 | 60.311 | 60.223 | 60.2 | 17.266 | 17.109 | 17.001 | 17 |
100 | 60.98 | 60.845 | 60.784 | 60.78 | 17.345 | 17.261 | 17.201 | 17.2 |
150 | 65.379 | 65.245 | 65.222 | 65.2 | 18.187 | 18.100 | 18.005 | 18 |
200 | 66.379 | 66.322 | 66.308 | 66.3 | 18.721 | 18.655 | 18.623 | 18.6 |
250 | 67.138 | 67.015 | 67.008 | 67 | 19.199 | 19.087 | 19.004 | 19 |
300 | 68.612 | 68.525 | 68.500 | 68.5 | 19.487 | 19.328 | 19.311 | 19.3 |
350 | 70.329 | 70.222 | 70.205 | 70.2 | 19.867 | 19.820 | 19.807 | 19.8 |
400 | 70.788 | 70.725 | 70.712 | 70.7 | 20.125 | 20.074 | 20.052 | 20.05 |
Performance time | 7.1 (second) – over no. of blocks \(\ge 7\) |