Table 26 Evaluation on the domain expert framework.
Evaluation criteria | Mean score (out of 5) | Std. Dev. | Min | Max | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tumor boundary accuracy | 4.6 | 0.49 | 4 | 5 | High agreement on precise tumor localization |
Segmentation interpretability | 4.5 | 0.53 | 4 | 5 | Tumor regions are clearly distinguishable from healthy tissue |
Classification confidence | 4.2 | 0.63 | 3 | 5 | Confidence levels are consistent with expert assessments |
Image quality post-processing | 4.7 | 0.45 | 4 | 5 | Filtering techniques enhanced structural clarity effectively |
Clinical usability of visual outputs | 4.1 | 0.57 | 3 | 5 | Outputs are understandable and helpful in supporting diagnosis |
Overall diagnostic utility | 4.4 | 0.51 | 4 | 5 | Experts endorse framework as a strong clinical decision support |
