Table 27 Questionnaire.
# | Evaluation criteria | Rating scale | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | Tumor boundary accuracy (how precisely are tumor margins captured?) |
|
|
|
|
|
2 | Segmentation interpretability (how clear is the distinction between tumor and normal tissue?) |
|
|
|
|
|
3 | Classification confidence (do the classifications align with your expectations?) |
|
|
|
|
|
4 | Image quality after processing (clarity, contrast, noise suppression) |
|
|
|
|
|
5 | Usability of visual outputs for diagnosis (ease of understanding and integration into workflow) |
|
|
|
|
|
6 | Overall diagnostic utility (is this system useful as a decision-support tool?) |
|
|
|
|
|
