Table 5 Comparative evaluation between CNN and capsule networks.
Model | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Dice coefficient (%) | F1-Score (%) | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNN | 94.23 | 92.10 | 93.88 | 89.34 | 92.98 | Lacks spatial sensitivity; struggles with overlapping structures |
CapsuleNet | 96.85 | 94.91 | 96.12 | 93.12 | 95.51 | Better spatial awareness and orientation sensitivity |
Aniso-ResCapHGBO-Net | 99.07 | 98.54 | 99.82 | 96.81 | 99.18 | Combines CapsNet spatial insight with ResNet’s depth and HGBO optimization |