Table 4 Direct effects of content complexity and A/V ratio on program satisfaction.
From: How content complexity and sensory modality influence student satisfaction in art education
Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | 5.199*** | 5.342*** | 5.200*** | 5.342*** |
(0.127) | (0.136) | (0.128) | (0.136) | |
Control variables | ||||
Beijing | 0.040 | 0.032 | 0.039 | 0.032 |
(0.026) | (0.026) | (0.026) | (0.026) | |
Tianjin | 0.110** | 0.107** | 0.110** | 0.107** |
(0.038) | (0.038) | (0.038) | (0.038) | |
Shanghai | − 0.041 | − 0.045 | − 0.041 | − 0.045 |
(0.036) | (0.035) | (0.036) | (0.035) | |
Chongqing | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0.045 |
(0.036) | (0.036) | (0.036) | (0.036) | |
Department level | − 0.008 | − 0.007 | − 0.008 | − 0.007 |
(0.016) | (0.016) | (0.016) | (0.016) | |
Firm age | − 0.013 | − 0.015 | − 0.013 | − 0.015 |
(0.021) | (0.021) | (0.021) | (0.021) | |
Business diversity | − 0.039† | − 0.041* | − 0.039† | − 0.041* |
(0.021) | (0.021) | (0.021) | (0.021) | |
Capital size | 0.005* | 0.004* | 0.005* | 0.004* |
(0.002) | (0.002) | (0.002) | (0.002) | |
F/M ratio | − 0.004 | − 0.012 | − 0.005 | − 0.012 |
(0.018) | (0.018) | (0.018) | (0.018) | |
Voters | − 0.088*** | − 0.089*** | − 0.088*** | − 0.089*** |
(0.006) | (0.006) | (0.006) | (0.006) | |
Independent variables | ||||
Content complexity | − 0.045** | − 0.045** | ||
(0.015) | (0.015) | |||
A/V ratio | 0.002 | − 0.001 | ||
(0.010) | (0.010) | |||
F-Statistics | 28.909*** | 27.240*** | 26.266*** | 24.954*** |
Adjusted R-Square | 0.155 | 0.159 | 0.154 | 0.159 |
ΔAdjusted R-Square | – | 2.88% | − 3.14% | 2.88% |
Degrees of Freedom | 1513 | 1512 | 1512 | 1511 |
