Table 4 Comparison of the predictive ability of NC and other composite variables for PCOS or/and MetS. Abbreviations as in Table 3.

From: Predictive values of neck circumference and TyG index on polycystic ovary syndrome with metabolic syndrome

PCOS combined with MetS

β

SE

Wald

Unadjusted OR

(95% CI)

P

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

P

PCOS vs. Control

       

NC

0.970

0.1285

6.966

2.638(2.050,3.393)

0.000

1.842(1.056,3.215)

0.032

TyG

4.675

0.471

98.529

10.722(4.260,26.988)

0.000

2.804(1.082, 5.251)

0.045

VAI

2.256

0.426

28.011

11.847(6.096,23.027)

0.000

5.476(1.027,10.966)

0.529

LAP

0.0138

0.015

81.872

1.148(1.115,1.183)

0.000

1.125(0.805,1.489)

0.089

CVAI

0.058

0.007

69.505

1.059(1.045,1.074)

0.000

1.090(0.935,1.175)

0.912

ApoB/ApoA

3.048

0.532

32.878

21.074(7.435,59.733)

0.000

5.342(0.727,8.717)

0.336

LH/FSH

1.579

0.473

11.164

4.850(1.921,12.246)

0.000

3.243(1.033,31.440)

0.614

PCOS + MetS

vs. Control

       

NC

1.469

0.180

66.852

4.346 (3.056, 6.181)

0.000

3.516(1.910,6.472)

0.000

TyG

7.188

0.569

159.801

13.237 (4.343,40.348)

0.000

3.386(2.013, 6.208 )

0.005

VAI

2.532

0.434

34.031

15.766(7.976,31.163)

0.000

3.088(1.013,7.627)

0.068

LAP

0.170

0.016

115.333

1.186(1.149,1.223)

0.000

1.007(0.686,1.477)

0.073

CVAI

0.102

0.009

142.247

1.108(1.089,1.126)

0.000

1.018(0.849,1.220)

0.847

ApoB/ApoA

5.633

0.569

97.899

27.949(9.157,85.302

0.000

5.325(2.704,10,480)

0.095

LH/FSH

6.267

0.579

117.186

5.267(1.693,16.379)

0.001

9.381(5.493,16.020)

0.009