Table 2 Overview of related studies in PV panel defect detection research.
From: ResNet-based image processing approach for precise detection of cracks in photovoltaic panels
Reference | Year | Technique Used | Study Description | Major Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | Knowledge distillation with YOLOX and CSPHN networks. | Employs a bi-branch collaborative training method with knowledge distillation for PV hot-spot identification, emphasizing improvements in detection precision and computational efficiency. | Attained an AP50 metric of 82.2%, indicating rapid and precise hot-spot defect identification over diverse adverse situations. | |
2024 | DL using surveillance camera images. | Created SoilingEdge, a DL methodology for estimating power loss from the soiling of PV panels from images obtained from edge devices such as security cameras. | Accomplished precise power loss assessment from soiling by advanced image processing techniques on edge platforms, enabling reliable inference for outdoor PV monitoring. | |
2023 | Ghost Convolution Including YOLOv5 with BottleneckCSP and Tiny Target Prediction Head (GBH-YOLOv5) | The study introduces GBH-YOLOv5, a new method for detecting tiny defects on PV panels using advanced image processing. | Achieving at least a 27.8% increase in accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methods. | |
2022 | End-to-end approach using Red Green Blue (RGB) imagery from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and YOLOv4 architecture for DL-based defect detection. | The study develops a method using UAV-acquired RGB imagery and YOLOv4 to detect, identify, and locate defects in solar PV modules. | The defect detection achieved 83% accuracy on the validation set and 73% on the test set in large-scale PV installations. | |
2022 | DL using ResNet152-Xception and a coordinate attention mechanism. | Deep-learning model using ResNet152-Xception and attention for PV cell defect detection, addressing data scarcity and imbalance. | The model achieves 96.17% accuracy in binary classification and 92.13% in multiclassification of PV cell defects, outperforming several common models. | |
2021 | U-net semantic segmentation for EL image analysis of PV modules. | The study utilizes U-net architecture to detect and quantify defects in solar PV modules through EL imaging, spanning various module designs and image qualities. | Defects in silicon wafer-based solar cells that are mono- or multi-crystalline are efficiently identified and measured by the U-net model. | |
2021 | Synchronized Thermography (ST) using a portable IR-camera. | The research investigates PV fault identification by Infrared Radiation (IR) thermography, emphasizing the adaptation of observations to varying outside situations. | IR thermography is effective in detecting PV panel defects in various harsh conditions, providing consistent information with common conditions. | |
2021 | Optical Stepped Thermography with post-data processing algorithms. | The study utilizes optical stepped thermography, halogen lamps, and IR camera monitoring to enhance defect signatures in PV panels. | This method effectively identifies defects in PV panels, with processed images being more evaluative than raw thermal images. | |
2020 | Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) | identification of solar cell microcracks by EL image analysis. | Achieved 92.67% accuracy with SVM and 93.67% with BPNN in classifying solar cells as cracked or not. | |
2019 | Steerable evidence filtering, local thresholding, and a minimum spanning tree for crack detection. | Identifying fissures in multicrystalline solar cells with improved contrast crack saliency maps and segmentation techniques for comprehensive crack extraction. | 94.4% average detection rate for various types of cracks. | |
2019 | Machine learning (ML) - SVM, Random Forest (RF) with Hough transform for pattern detection. | Automatic splitting of EL images into cells, defect detection, and feature computation for precise defect categorization in PV panels. | Achieved high accuracy (0.997) but lower recall (0.274) using SVM in defect type identification. |