Table 5 Comparison of Oudemansiella raphanipes identification results of different models.

From: OR-FCOS: an enhanced fully convolutional one-stage approach for growth stage identification of Oudemansiella raphanipes

Category

Models

\(\hbox {mAP}_{50}\)

(%)

\(\hbox {mAP}_{50:95}\)

(%)

Params

(M)

Size

(MB)

Inf. speed

(FPS)

GPU mem

(MB)

FLOPs

(G)

Anchor-based

Faster R-CNN

85.0

72.0

41.8

167.3

21.0

462.0

173.0

RetinaNet

83.2

69.7

38.0

152.2

21.7

419.0

202.0

YOLOv11n

88.0

75.7

2.6

5.5

75.8

1290.0

6.5

RetinaNet-based ATSS

83.2

72.5

32.3

129.5

22.1

398.0

174.0

Anchor-free

CenterNet

84.5

73.7

32.3

129.5

24.0

398.0

170.0

FCOS-based AutoAssign

80.9

68.8

36.4

146.0

22.4

413.0

171.0

FCOS

82.3

69.7

32.3

129.5

23.4

398.0

167.0

YOLOv8n

88.0

76.3

3.2

6.2

102.0

1294.0

8.2

OR-FCOS (ours)

89.4

78.3

9.9

40.1

24.0

255.0

31.2