Table 5 Impact of tillage and weed management options on soil pH and soil organic carbon (SOC) at 60 days after sowing (DAS) of winter maize (after 3rd year).

From: Cumulative impact of herbicides and tillage in conservation agriculture on soil microbiome, fungal diversity and crop productivity

Treatment

pH

SOC (g kg-₁)

Tillage

WM

0–15 cm

T1: CT(C)-CT(M)-Fallow (NSr)

W1

7.37

6.50

W2

7.02

6.53

W3

7.11

6.88

W4

7.12

6.93

T2: CT(C)-ZT(M)-ZT(Sr)

W1

7.17

7.15

W2

7.11

7.17

W3

7.16

7.25

W4

7.11

7.28

T3: ZT(C) + SrR-ZT(M) + CR-ZT(Sr) + MS

W1

6.79

7.56

W2

7.14

7.80

W3

7.12

7.97

W4

7.11

8.35

Tillage (Main plots)

T1: CT(C)-CT(M)-Fallow (NSr)

7.16

6.71

T2: CT(C)-ZT(M)-ZT(Sr)

7.14

7.21

T3: ZT(C) + SrR-ZT(M) + CR-ZT(Sr) + MS

7.04

7.92

Weed Management (Subplots)

W1- Chemical weed control

7.11

7.07

W2- Herbicide rotation

7.09

7.17

W3- IWM

7.13

7.37

W4- Single hand-weeded control

7.11

7.52

 

SE(m)±

CD

(P = 0.05)

SE(m) ±

CD(P = 0.05)

Tillage

0.14

NS

0.15

0.57

Weed Management

0.13

NS

0.19

NS

W at same level of T

0.23

NS

0.24

NS

T at same level of W

0.25

NS

0.25

NS

  1. T1 = conventional tillage (cotton) – conventional tillage (maize) – Fallow (No Sesbania rostrata), T2 = conventional tillage (cotton) – zero tillage (maize) – zero tillage (Sesbania rostrata), T3 = zero tillage (cotton) + Sesbania rostrata residues (SrR)– zero tillage (maize) + cotton residues (CR) – zero tillage (Sesbania rostrata) + maize stubbles (MS), T = TillIage, W = Weed management, IWM = Integrated weed management, CD (P = 0.05) = critical difference at 5% probability level, NS = non-significant, SE(m) = standard error of the mean.