Table 7 Kernel yield of maize and system yield in terms of system cotton equivalent yield (CEY) as influenced by tillage practices and weed management (WM) options after 3rd year.

From: Cumulative impact of herbicides and tillage in conservation agriculture on soil microbiome, fungal diversity and crop productivity

Treatment Interaction

WM

kernel yield

(kg ha-₁)

System (CEY)

(kg ha-₁)

Tillage

T1: CT(C)-CT(M)-Fallow (NSr)

W1

6822

3756

W2

6854

3801

W3

6354

3908

W4

4025

1848

W1

7133

4005

T2: CT(C)-ZT(M)-ZT(Sr)

W2

7662

4187

W3

6558

4109

W4

3559

1767

T3: ZT(C) + SrR-ZT(M) + CR-ZT(Sr) + MS

W1

7780

4292

W2

7456

4206

W3

7253

4453

W4

4713

2157

Tillage practices

T1: CT(C)-CT(M)-Fallow (NSr)

6014

3328

T2: CT(C)-ZT(M)-ZT(Sr)

6228

3517

T3: ZT(C) + SrR-ZT(M) + CR-ZT(Sr) + MS

6801

3775

Weed Management options

W1- Chemical weed control

7245

4018

W2- Herbicide rotation

7324

4065

W3- IWM

6722

4157

W4- Single hand-weeded control

4099

1921

 

SE(m)±

CD(P = 0.05)

SE(m)±

CD(P = 0.05)

Tillage

144.83

568.66

18.69

73.38

Weed Management

126.98

377.28

40.29

119.71

Interactions

W at same level of T

219.94

NS

69.79

207.35

T at same level of W

239.28

NS

63.26

187.96

  1. T1 = conventional tillage (cotton) – conventional tillage (maize) – Fallow (No Sesbania rostrata), T2 = conventional tillage (cotton) – zero tillage (maize) – zero tillage (Sesbania rostrata), T3 = zero tillage (cotton) + Sesbania rostrata residues (SrR)– zero tillage (maize) + cotton residues (CR) – zero tillage (Sesbania rostrata) + maize stubbles (MS), T = TillIage, W = Weed management, IWM = Integrated weed management, CD (P = 0.05) = critical difference at 5% probability level, NS = non-significant, SE(m) = standard error of the mean.