Table 10 Comparative analysis of the proposed models with the existing state of arts.
Authors | Feature Selection Methods | Hyperparameter Tuning | Classification Methods | Accuracy (%) | Time (s) | Sensitivity (%) | Precision (%) | F1-Score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vijayshree et al.28 | Chi-squared | PSO | SVM | 88.22 | 148 | --- | --- | --- |
Shafiey et al.29 | GA | PSO | RF | 95.6 | 2525.59 | 94.1 | 96.2 | 95.1 |
Huang et al.23 | GA | --- | SVM | 85.6 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Tao et al.30 | GA | PSO | SVM | 89.88 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Khammassi et al.31 | GA-LR | --- | DT | 81.42 | --- | 79.3 | 82.0 | 80.6 |
Temitayo et al.32 | GA | --- | SVM | 93.5 | 119.56 | 92.8 | 94.1 | 93.4 |
Chen et al.33 | GA | --- | SVM | 95.56 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
Nandipati et al.34 | Pearson Correlation | --- | SVM / RF | 82.27 / 85 | 117.57 / 187 | 80.2 / 84.1 | 83.4 / 85.9 | 81.7 / 85 |
Sreejith et al.17 | Wrapper Method | Ant Colony | SVM / RF | 84.5 / 89.81 | --- | 83.2 / 88.9 | 85.0 / 90.5 | 84.1 / 89.7 |
Abdulsalam et al.35 | --- | --- | QSVM / QNN | 88 / 86 | 317 / 455.51 | 87.5 / 85.1 | 88.2 / 86.3 | 87.8 / 85.7 |
Proposed Classical Model | CGA | CPSO | CSVM | 94.02 | 362.92 | 93.1 | 94.4 | 93.7 |
Proposed Quantum Model | QGA | QPSO | QSVM | 97.83 | 413.57 | 97.2 | 98.1 | 97.6 |
