Table 1 Weightage of different classes for identification of groundwater prospect zone.

From: Deciphering of groundwater potential zones in hard rock terrain using GIS technology with AHP statistical methods: A case study of Nilgiri, Tamil Nadu, India

Parameters

Classes

Wi

Weight

Influence%

Rank

Rainfall

Low

0.144

0.33

33

1

Moderate

0.277

3

High

0.579

4

 

CI – 0.005

RI −0.58

CR-0.008

 

Geology

Charnockite

0.118

0.23

23

4

Hornblende biotite gneiss

0.203

3

Epidote–hornblende gneiss

0.162

1

Garnet-sillimanite gneiss

0.071

2

Quartz vein

0.035

1

Shales with bands of limestone

0.344

3

Syenite/Nephelene syenite corrundun syenite

0.065

2

 

CI – 0.010

RI −1.32

 

CR-0.008

 

Geomorphology units

Valley fill

0.203

0.18

18

4

Denudational hills

0.219

3

Structural hill

0.098

1

Pediplain

0.240

2

Piedmont zone

0.240

2

 

CI – 0.115

RI −1.12

 

CR-0.008

 

Slope

Gentile slope

0.099

0.8

8

3

Moderate slope

0.210

2

Steep slope

0.345

1

Very steep slope

0.345

1

 

CI – 0.023

RI – 0.026

 

CR-0.009

 

Lineament density

Very high lineament density

0.125

0.5

5

4

Moderate lineament density

0.194

3

Low lineament density

0.356

2

Very low lineament density

0.325

1

 

CI – 0.016

RI – 0.018

 

CR-0.009

 

Drainage density

Very high drainage density

0.130

0.7

7

1

Moderate drainage density

0.159

2

Low drainage density

0.296

3

Very low drainage density

0.415

4

 

CI – 0.033

RI – 0.036

 

CR-0.009

 

Land use/land cover

Waterbody

0.101

0.3

3

4

Cultivation land

0.191

3

Forest lands

0.258

3

Waste land rock surface

0.294

1

Settlements

0.156

1

 

CI – 0.068

RI – 0.061

 

CR-1.12

 

Soil

Alfisols

0.169

0.3

3

2

Entisols

0.092

2

Forest unsurveys

0.160

3

Hill soil

0.130

3

Inceptisols

0.143

4

Reserve forest

0.185

2

Water bodies

0.120

4

 

CI – 0.123

RI – 0.093

 

CR-1.32