Table 23 Computational performance comparison across sample sizes and architectures.

From: Novel dual gland GAN architecture improves human protein localization classification using salivary and pituitary gland inspired loss functions

Architecture

Sample size (K)

Training time (hours)

Memory usage (GB)

GPU memory (GB)

Convergence epochs

Time per epoch (min)

Total GPU hours

Energy consumption (kWh)

Dual-Gland GAN (Ours)

10

8.4

12.3

18.7

78

6.5

8.4

21.8

25

18.7

28.4

24.1

82

13.7

18.7

48.6

50

34.2

45.6

31.2

85

24.1

34.2

89.1

100

62.8

78.9

42.3

89

42.3

62.8

163.4

Traditional GAN

10

14.6

8.9

14.2

156

5.6

14.6

38.0

25

35.8

18.7

19.3

168

12.8

35.8

93.2

50

78.4

32.1

25.6

184

25.6

78.4

204.1

100

167.2

58.3

34.7

201

49.9

167.2

435.1

DCGAN

10

11.2

9.8

15.6

125

5.4

11.2

29.1

25

26.4

21.3

21.8

134

11.8

26.4

68.6

50

58.7

36.9

28.4

147

24.0

58.7

152.6

100

128.5

67.2

38.1

159

48.5

128.5

334.1

WGAN

10

9.8

10.4

16.2

108

5.4

9.8

25.5

25

22.1

23.6

22.9

115

11.5

22.1

57.5

50

47.3

41.2

29.7

124

22.9

47.3

123.0

100

98.7

75.8

39.4

132

44.9

98.7

256.6

ECP-IGANN

10

12.8

14.7

22.3

95

8.1

12.8

33.3

25

31.5

32.1

28.6

102

18.5

31.5

82.0

50

68.9

58.4

36.2

109

37.9

68.9

179.1

100

145.7

103.6

47.8

118

74.1

145.7

378.8

GSIP-GAN

10

15.3

16.2

24.1

112

8.2

15.3

39.8

25

37.8

35.7

31.4

118

19.2

37.8

98.3

50

82.4

64.3

39.7

125

39.6

82.4

214.2

100

174.6

118.9

52.1

133

78.7

174.6

454.0