Table 5 Quantitative comparison of methods on module based ablation experiments on the TNO dataset.
From: Texture-preserving and information loss minimization method for infrared and visible image fusion
Methods | MI | VIF | AG | CC | SCD | EN | QAB/F | SF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o MSFEM | 2.2673 | 0.5174 | 4.2693 | 0.4220 | 1.4996 | 6.8337 | 0.3561 | 10.1062 |
w/o CEM | 2.1973 | 0.4671 | 4.3395 | 0.4099 | 1.3794 | 6.8562 | 0.4392 | 11.9584 |
w/o TEM | 1.9508 | 0.4379 | 4.1093 | 0.3855 | 1.2954 | 7.0272 | 0.2720 | 13.1898 |
w/o TEM&CEM | 1.8530 | 0.4356 | 4.2176 | 0.4698 | 1.6724 | 7.0776 | 0.3200 | 11.0951 |
w/o DAM | 2.2759 | 0.4099 | 4.1363 | 0.4453 | 1.5352 | 6.2962 | 0.4201 | 9.6174 |
TPFusion | 2.4564 | 0.5687 | 4.3945 | 0.4665 | 1.6801 | 7.0514 | 0.5213 | 12.1247 |
