Table 10 A state-of-the-art quantitative comparison between Sb2(S, Se)3 cells without HTL performed by experimental and simulated studies.
From: Unveiling the role of dual grading in device optimization of HTL-free Sb2(S, Se)3 solar cells
Reference | ETL | Approach | PCE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
TiO2 | Experimental | 5.6% | |
CdS | Experimental | 7.31 | |
CdS | Experimental | 6.30 | |
ZnO/CdS | Experimental | 5.73% | |
Cd0.44Zn0.56S | Simulation | 14.86% | |
Cd0.44Zn0.56S | Simulation | 21.86. | |
Zn0.85Mg0.15O | Simulation | 20 | |
This work | CdS | Simulation | 7.31 |
This work | Eg Graded Cd1−xZnxS | Simulation | 15.07 |
This work | Eg Graded Cd1−xZnxS, NA = 3 × 1015 cm−3 | Simulation | 16.13 |
This work | Eg Graded Cd1−xZnxS, Graded NA | Simulation | 17.65 |
This work | Eg Graded Cd1−xZnxS, Graded NA, 10% Nt, tabs =1 μm | Simulation | 21.15 |
