Table 2 Comparing the result of occurrence evaluation and physical validity of the proposed ASDB gates; compared with previous works10,12,13,19.
ASDB gates | Proposed design | Design in10 | Design in19 | Design in13 | Design in12 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occurrence (%) | Physical validity | Occurrence (%) | Physical validity | Occurrence (%) | Physical validity | Occurrence (%) | Physical validity | Occurrence (%) | Physical validity | |
AND | 97 | Yes | 92 | Yes | 98 | Yes | 97 | Yes | 98. | Yes |
NAND | 89 | Yes | 89 | Yes | 77 | Yes | 89 | Yes | 79. | Yes |
OR | 99 | Yes | 97 | Yes | 61 | Yes | 98 | Yes | 65.01 | Yes |
NOR | 82 | Yes | 93 | Yes | NR | Yes | NR | Yes | NR | Yes |
XOR | 95 | Yes | 92 | Yes | 83 | Yes | 81 | Yes | 85 | Yes |
XNOR | 97 | Yes | NR | Yes | 62 | NR | 79 | Yes | 68. | Yes |
