Table 2 Weighted logistic regression analysis on the association between BRI and myopia.

From: Association between body roundness index and myopia among US adolescents: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2001–2006

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

OR (95% CI)

P value

OR (95% CI)

P value

OR (95% CI)

P value

BRI continuous

1.057 (1.016–1.100)

0.009

1.049 (1.008–1.090)

0.023

1.049 (1.009–1.090)

0.022

BRI-Q1

Reference

–

Reference

–

Reference

–

BRI-Q2

0.989 (0.834–1.172)

0.900

0.941 (0.791–1.119)

0.496

0.936 (0.790–1.109)

0.452

BRI-Q3

0.919 (0.740–1.141)

0.448

0.843 (0.672–1.059)

0.151

0.837 (0.664–1.055)

0.143

BRI-Q4

1.349 (1.116–1.630)

0.004

1.255 (1.036–1.522)

0.026

1.261 (1.046–1.521)

0.022

P for trend

 

0.002

 

0.006

 

0.005

  1. Data are presented as OR (95% CI). Model 1: no adjustment; Model 2: adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity; Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity PIR, Ref education, VD, Mets, ST.
  2. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BRI, body roundness index; Ref Education, Education level of guardian; PIR, poverty income ratio; Mets, PA, physical activity; ST, Screen time; VD, Serum vitamin D; Q1, 1st quartile; Q2, 2nd quartile; Q3, 3rd quartile; Q4, 4th quartile.
Back to article page