Table 2 Specific results and parameters of the data-driven model.

From: Decoding student cognitive abilities: a comparative study of explainable AI algorithms in educational data mining

Model

SD and CV(%)

Fold status

Folds

Avg loss

Key parameters

LASSO​

0.0032, 0.73%

Best

6

0.441

Alpha: 0.00214

Worst

5

0.4471

Alpha: 0.00351

XGBoost​

0.002, 0.48%

Best

3

0.4531

LR: 0.0611, Depth: 4, Trees: 270

Worst

7

0.4574

LR: 0.1077, Depth: 3, Trees: 250

RF

0.0102, 2.67%

Best

4

0.414

Depth: 20, Split: 0.1013, Trees: 160

Worst

5

0.4389

Depth: 15, Split: 0.1004, Trees: 300

NN​

0.0275, 4.68%

Best

4

0.4479

Act: logistic, Alpha: 0.090, Layers: 100, Iter: 700

Worst

3

0.5169

Act: relu, Alpha: 0.00013, Layers: 50, Iter: 900

​SVM​

0.0048, 0.98%

Best

6

0.4423

C: 63.62, Epsilon: 0.5525

Worst

2

0.4544

C: 87.66, Epsilon: 0.3909