Table 4 Details of defined numerical simulations in the matrix of experiments.
From: Flow regime transitions in flow blurring injection through a CFD parametric study
Blocks | #R | Inputs | Treatment Combination | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\rho _{liq}\) | \(\mu _{liq}\) | \(\sigma _{liq}\) | \(\dot{m}_{liq}\) | \(\dot{m}_{air}\) | |||
1 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
2 | + | – | – | – | – | \(\rho _{liq}\) | |
3 | – | + | – | – | – | \(\mu _{liq}\) | |
4 | + | + | – | – | – | \(\rho _{liq} \times \mu _{liq}\) | |
2 | 5 | – | – | + | – | – | \(\sigma _{liq}\) |
6 | + | – | + | – | – | \(\rho _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq}\) | |
7 | – | + | + | – | – | \(\mu _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq}\) | |
8 | + | + | + | – | – | \(\rho _{liq} \times \mu _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq}\) | |
3 | 9 | – | – | – | + | – | \(\dot{m}_{liq}\) |
10 | + | – | – | + | – | \(\rho _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq}\) | |
11 | – | + | – | + | – | \(\mu _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq}\) | |
12 | + | + | – | + | – | \(\rho _{liq} \times \mu _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq}\) | |
4 | 13 | – | – | + | + | – | \(\sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq}\) |
14 | + | – | + | + | – | \(\rho _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq}\) | |
15 | – | + | + | + | – | \(\mu _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq}\) | |
16 | + | + | + | + | – | \(\rho _{liq} \times \mu _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq}\) | |
5 | 17 | – | – | – | – | + | \(\dot{m}_{air}\) |
18 | + | – | – | – | + | \(\rho _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
19 | – | + | – | – | + | \(\mu _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
20 | + | + | – | – | + | \(\rho _{liq} \times \mu _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
6 | 21 | – | – | + | – | + | \(\sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) |
22 | + | – | + | – | + | \(\rho _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
23 | – | + | + | – | + | \(\mu _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
24 | + | + | + | – | + | \(\rho _{liq} \times \mu _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
7 | 25 | – | – | – | + | + | \(\dot{m}_{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) |
26 | + | – | – | + | + | \(\rho _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
27 | – | + | – | + | + | \(\mu _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
28 | + | + | – | + | + | \(\rho _{liq} \times \mu _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
8 | 29 | – | – | + | + | + | \(\sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) |
30 | + | – | + | + | + | \(\rho _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
31 | – | + | + | + | + | \(\mu _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
32 | + | + | + | + | + | \(\rho _{liq} \times \mu _{liq} \times \sigma _{liq} \times \dot{m}_{liq} \times \dot{m}_{air}\) | |
