Table 11 Comparison of coverage results.
From: Coverage optimization of wireless sensor network utilizing an improved CS with multi-strategies
Algorithms | Iterations | Coverage Performance | Number of nodes 20 | Number of nodes 30 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CS | 200 | Best Mean Std | 70.93% 67.12% 0.0149372 | 82.62% 80.18% 0.0170272 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 72.12% 70.41% 0.013902 | 84.80% 81.73% 0.0259844 | |
GA | 200 | Best Mean Std | 75.16% 72.35% 0.0157003 | 88.60% 85.89% 0.0171310 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 77.14% 74.18% 0.0203110 | 91.63% 87.86% 0.0256515 | |
ACO | 200 | Best Mean Std | 64.61% 62.07% 0.0157003 | 79.31% 76.89% 0.0138658 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 65.53% 63.42% 0.01310163 | 82.12% 78.47% 0.0181968 | |
PSO | 200 | Best Mean Std | 68.26% 66.05% 0.0184519 | 80.93% 78.98% 0.0115261 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 69.31% 66.59% 0.0189453 | 81.94% 78.65% 0.017797 | |
ECS | 200 | Best Mean Std | 80.44% 79.52% 0.0053903 | 94.12% 93.09% 0.0050917 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 83.50% 82.71% 0.0037609 | 96.91% 96.62% 0.0019163 | |
MACS | 200 | Best Mean Std | 74.69% 73.69% 0.0098432 | 89.86% 89.01% 0.0060058 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 82.59% 81.88% 0.0034299 | 96.31% 95.80% 0.0033658 | |
WCSDE | 200 | Best Mean Std | 73.98% 72.11% 0.0076542 | 87.22% 85.22% 0.0089778 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 75.42% 74.51% 0.0060133 | 89.69% 87.93% 0.0103000 | |
CSDE | 200 | Best Mean Std | 83.44% 81.92% 0.0102460 | 97.30% 96.35% 0.00565842 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 84.77% 83.29% 0.0083995 | 99.00% 98.23% 0.0038888 | |
ICS-ABC-OBL | 200 | Best Mean Std | 73.08% 71.76% 0.0108151 | 87.94% 86.01% 0.0124267 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 74.23% 72.31% 0.0502111 | 88.02% 86.14% 0.0104085 | |
ICS | 200 | Best Mean Std | 71.82% 66.89% 0.02595667 | 84.93% 81.05% 0.0161400 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 72.44% 67.80% 0.0239626 | 83.88% 81.16% 0.0194161 | |
ICS-MS | 200 | Best Mean Std | 84.83% 84.24% 0.0036245 | 99.33% 99.10% 0.0012426 |
1000 | Best Mean Std | 85.63% 85.07% 0.0046045 | 99.61% 99.46% 0.0010821 |
