Table 1 Comparison of representative studies on agricultural transformation Evaluation.

From: Impact of agricultural industry transformation based on deep learning model evaluation and metaheuristic algorithms under dual carbon strategy

Author (Year)

Main Contribution

Method

Limitations

Srivastava et al. (2022)

Developed CNN model to analyze temporal links between environmental variables and winter wheat yield

1D convolution to capture temporal relations of environmental variables

Ignored spatial heterogeneity; no metaheuristic optimization

Mujeeb & Javaid (2023)

Proposed ISDAE-PSO framework to optimize carbon emission prediction

Feature engineering combined with PSO to optimize DNN parameters

Did not consider regional policy and climate differences; single data source

Guo et al. (2024a)

Proposed DCNN-LSTM hybrid model for multi-index climate prediction

Combined DCNN for spatial features and LSTM for temporal dependencies

No hyperparameter optimization; limited adaptability in dynamic scenarios

Rokhva et al. (2025)

Built EfficientNetB7-CBAM model for food classification

Attention mechanism fused with transfer learning

Not adapted for agricultural multimodal data; lacks spatiotemporal modeling

El-Kenawy et al. (2024)

Developed GWO-optimized framework for potato yield prediction

Grey Wolf Optimization integrated with gradient boosting

Did not integrate remote sensing data; policy dynamic effects not encoded

This study

Constructed CNN-LSTM-SMA hybrid model for multisource-driven dynamic agricultural transformation evaluation

Fused CNN-LSTM to extract spatiotemporal features, optimized hyperparameters with SMA, designed region-adaptive strategies

Dependent on historical data timeliness; cross-large-scale geographic generalization requires further validation