Table 4 Summarized published deep learning models developed for differentiation of HPV-related dysplastic lesions in the cervical and anal regions.

From: Automated detection and classification of cervical and anal squamous cancer precursors using deep learning and multidevice colposcopy

 

Publication

AI model

Centers

Devices

Frames

Included stainings

Main characteristics of the study

Sen %

Spe %

AUC-ROC

Cervical lesions

Miyagi et al.16

ResNet

1

1

330

Non-stained

HSIL vs LSIL only 1 frame per procedure

80

88

0.83

Yuan et al.18

ResNet

1

1

22,330

Non-stained acetic acid lugol

HSIL vs others (normal or LSIL)

85

82

0.93

Xue et al.17

U-net+YOLO

6

1

19,435

Non-stained

HSIL vs others (normal or LSIL or cancer)

66

90

0.78

Chen et al.14

E-B0 with GRU

1

1

6002

Non-stained acetic acid lugol

HSIL vs LSIL

88

94

0.91

Fang et al.15

ShuffleNet

1

1

1189

Non-stained

HSIL vs others (normal or LSIL or cancer)

82

0.99

Saraiva et al.13

ResNet

1

1

22,693

Non-stained acetic acid lugol

HSIL vs LSIL

90

98

0.98

Anal lesions

Saraiva et al.19

Xception

1

1 (proctoscope)

5026

Non-stained acetic acid lugol

HSIL vs LSIL

Pilot study

91

90

0.97

Saraiva et al.20

ResNet

1

1 (proctoscope)

27,770

Non-stained acetic acid lugol

HSIL vs LSIL

Sub analysis per category, including “post-manipulation phase” (after lesion biopsy or treatment)

97

94

0.99

Saraiva et al.12

ResNet

2

2 (proctoscope+colposcope)

57,882

Non-stained acetic acid lugol

HSIL vs LSIL@Contributed to interoperability

94

96

0.97