Table 1 Presents a thorough examination of the current body of research. Table 1: comprehensive analysis.
Author | Year | Model Used | Advantage | Limitation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Omeka, M. E. et al14. | 2024 | GIS-based machine learning | It provides accurate prediction of irrigation water quality based on real-time data | The accuracy of the prediction is dependent on the quality and quantity of the input data. |
Mellal, N. E. H., et al15. | 2024 | Artificial Neural Network | It allows for accurate and reliable prediction of purified water quality | It may not take into account complex and changing environmental factors |
Zhang, Y., et al16. | 2021 | Hybrid feedback Machine factorization machine model | This model can accurately predict water quality parameters from hyperspectral images, enabling efficient data collection and analysis. | It may have limited applicability to areas with different environmental conditions and may require additional calibration for accurate results. |
Bakhtiarizadeh, A., et al17. | 2024 | Machine Learning Model | Improved accuracy in predicting groundwater quality, aiding in resource management and protection. | It requires extensive data collection and processing, may be less applicable in areas with limited data availability. |
Suman, S. K., et al18. | 2022 | Machine Learning Model | Fast and accurate predictions can be made using advanced Machine learning methods. | Availability and quality of residuals may affect the accuracy and applicability of the predictions. |
Yang, S., et al19. | 2024 | Machine Learning Model | This model allows for a more transparent and easily understandable approach to estimating water quality. | The model’s performance and accuracy may still be limited by the quality of input data and the assumptions made in creating the index. |
Sundar, L. S., et al20. | 2023 | Machine Learning Algorithm | This model reduces carbon footprint in waste water treatment. | Dependence on accurate data input and complex computing may limit its practicality in all settings. |
Cechinel, M. A. P., et al21. | 2024 | Machine Learning Prediction | This model can accurately predict effluent quality, optimizing treatment processes for better environmental and cost outcomes. | This model may require complex data analysis and significant upfront investment in technology and training. |
Xu, T., et al22. | 2020 | Adaptive synthetic sampling algorithm | This model increases accuracy of predicting water quality, allowing for more informed decisions on recreational activities. | The model is dependent on accurate and up-to-date data, which may be difficult to obtain and maintain. |
Zhong, H., et al23. | 2022 | Machine Learning Prediction | This model provides accurate predictions for MBR water quality. | Limited to the specific dataset used and may not be applicable to other MBR systems. |
Sangwan, V., et al24. | 2024 | Machine Learning Framework | This model provides accurate and real-time predictions | This model may require large amounts of data and complex algorithms to achieve high accuracy. |
Cai, D., et al25. | 2024 | Transformer-based Machine learning | This model provides accurate and timely prediction of water quality for effective management of water resources. | This model relies on accurate and sufficient historical data for training, may not be applicable for areas with sparse data |
Liu, C., et al26. | 2022 | Machine Learning Framework | This model provides real-time monitoring and analysis of fish behaviour. | This model may not accurately detect and track fish in turbid or cluttered water conditions. |
Ramesh, E., et al27. | 2023 | Machine-learning based optimization | Automated optimization process can efficiently explore wide range of design parameters. | This model dependent on availability and accuracy of training data for the machine learning algorithm. |