Table 3 ANOVA on morpho-physiological and phenological traits in response to drought stress in pot marigold.
Source of variation | df | Mean squares | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CT | RW | DB | DP | PH | BN | FN | FD | MD | ||
Irrigation treatment | 2 | 6.4*** | 147** | 54ns | 29.3ns | 200ns | 6.1ns | 2.6ns | 1.7ns | 0.3ns |
Error | 12 | 0.3 | 18.9 | 119 | 151 | 57.9 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.08 |
CV (%) | Â | 2.1 | 38.4 | 32.8 | 29.3 | 22.4 | 38 | 29 | 12.4 | 15.3 |
S.V. | df | Mean squares | Â | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LN | FW | SW | RL | SR | RN | RV | FB | ||
Irrigation treatment | 2 | 119ns | 6.2ns | 1050*** | 18.8ns | 0.92*** | 28.1ns | 1040*** | 150.5ns |
Error | 12 | 53.1 | 2.4 | 61.3 | 4.3 | 0.05 | 73.1 | 67.3 | 527.3 |
CV (%) | Â | 19.5 | 27.6 | 36.7 | 16.1 | 13.1 | 22.7 | 28.8 | 30.1 |