Table 2 Sociodemographic characteristics of participants in the CG and IG.

From: Hospital-to-home care transition program for deep partial-thickness burns: improved scar outcomes and quality of life

Variables

Group

P-value

IG (n = 40)

CG (n = 40)

Frequency

Percentage

Frequency

Percentage

Gender

Female

28

70

24

60

0.348

Male

12

30

16

40

 

Martial status

Married

37

92.5

39

97.5

0.305

Single/Widow/Divorced

3

7.5

1

2.5

 

Education

Diploma and less

17

42.5

23

57.5

0.18

Academic

23

57.5

17

42.5

 

Occupation

Housewife

3

7.5

10

25

0.007

Employed

19

47.5

25

62.5

 

Self-employed

18

45

5

12.5

 

Number of family members

1–3

6

15

13

32.5

0.066

4–6

34

85

27

67.5

 

Income adequacy

     

Relatively sufficient

22

55

29

72.5

0.104

Sufficient

18

45

11

27.5

 

Causes of burns

Hot water and liquids

6

15

7

17.5

0.911

Flammable materials and equipment

6

15

7

17.5

 

Hot water vapor

9

22.5

11

27.5

 

Chemicals

10

25

8

20

 

A history of hospitalization for burns

Yes

9

22.5

12

30

0.768

No

31

77.5

28

70

 

Burn site

     

Arms

11

27.5

14

35

0.446

legs

12

30

11

27.5

 

Anterior and posterior trunk/Head and neck

17

42.5

15

37.5

 

Burn percentage

10–14

31

77.5

33

82.5

0.576

15–19

7

17.5

6

15

 

≥ 20

2

5

 

1

2.5

  1. Note: a: Chi-square test; b: Mann–Whitney U test; c: Fisher’s exact test.
  2. CG: Control Group; IG: Intervention Group; M: Mean; SD: Standard Deviation.
  3. P < 0.05.