Table 10 Ablation study results comparing CDM-BEOSAEM method with existing techniques on the Edge-IIoT dataset.
Edge-IIoT dataset | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Technique | \(\:Acc{u}_{y}\) | \(\:Pre{c}_{n}\) | \(\:Rec{a}_{l}\) | \(\:{F}_{score}\) |
BEOSA | 96.62 | 93.4 | 93.18 | 93.81 |
BiGRU Model | 97.32 | 94.03 | 93.93 | 94.51 |
AE Model | 97.94 | 94.77 | 94.68 | 95.02 |
GCN Model | 98.73 | 95.57 | 95.44 | 95.57 |
CDM-BEOSAEM | 99.29 | 96.10 | 96.10 | 96.10 |