Table 2 Patients’ perspective breakdown for ChatGPT-generated biopsy reports.
Questions: | Strongly disagree | Somewhat disagree | Neutral | Somewhat agree | Strongly agree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Structure: 1. This report is well-structured and easy to follow. | 0 (0%) | 2 (5%) | 2 (5%) | 6 (14%) | 31 (76%) |
Readability: 2. It clearly states the diagnosis, and I can understand the diagnosis easily. | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) | 4 (10%) | 7 (17%) | 29 (71%) |
Disease extent explanation: 3. I can understand the extent of the disease easily. | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) | 5 (12%) | 8 (20%) | 27 (66%) |
Gleason grade explanation: 4. The Gleason grade of cancer is clear to me. | 0 (0%) | 2 (5%) | 4 (10%) | 11 (27%) | 24 (58%) |
Comprehension: 5. This report will improve my understanding and other patients’ understanding of the disease. | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (17%) | 8 (20%) | 26 (63%) |
Future usability: 6. I would like to receive patient-centered generative AI reports during my care. | 3 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (17%) | 6 (14%) | 25 (62%) |
