Table 3 Performance comparison of different models for motor imagery classification.

From: Hierarchical attention enhanced deep learning achieves high precision motor imagery classification in brain computer interfaces

Model

Accuracy (%)

Precision (%)

Recall (%)

F1-Score (%)

AUC

Training time (s)

Random forest

92.52 ± 1.23

91.87 ± 1.45

92.52 ± 1.23

92.19 ± 1.34

0.982 ± 0.005

45.3 ± 2.7

SVM

90.18 ± 1.56

89.95 ± 1.78

90.18 ± 1.56

90.06 ± 1.67

0.976 ± 0.007

38.7 ± 1.9

LSTM

88.89 ± 2.01

88.23 ± 2.34

88.89 ± 2.01

88.56 ± 2.17

0.971 ± 0.009

256.4 ± 12.3

BiLSTM

91.75 ± 1.67

91.42 ± 1.89

91.75 ± 1.67

91.58 ± 1.78

0.980 ± 0.006

342.8 ± 15.6

CNN-LSTM

93.58 ± 1.12

93.21 ± 1.35

93.58 ± 1.12

93.39 ± 1.23

0.987 ± 0.004

478.2 ± 18.9

CNN-LSTM-Attention

97.25 ± 0.78

97.18 ± 0.89

97.25 ± 0.78

97.21 ± 0.83

0.995 ± 0.002

523.6 ± 21.5