Table 3 Comparison table of proposed antenna.
From: A hybrid mode semi circular shaped frequency reconfigurable antenna for multiband communication
Ref.No | Year | Size (mm) | Frequency (GHz) | Gain (dBi) | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 2020 | 30*30 | 0.77, 1.43, 2.13, 3.48, 3.84, 5.17, and 6 | 1.1, 1.3, 1.1, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, and 2.2 | Multiband, WLAN, WiMAX, Sub 6 GHz 5G, and Fixed Satellite Communication |
3 | 2020 | 55*50 | 6.02 | 3.59 | NB |
5 | 2023 | 59.5*35 | 3.4–5.32 | 6.02/5.37 | WB |
7 | 2017 | 40*40 | (3.1–10.6),3.6 and5.2 | 5.5 and 6 | UWB/C/S |
8 | 2015 | 80*70 | 2.78–10.85 | 4.13–5.83 | UWB |
9 | 2018 | 60*48 | (1.7–5.1), 3.2 and 5 | NA | UWB/NB |
10 | 2017 | 45*40 | (2.2–11), 2.4 and 5.8 | 3.2/2 | UWB and WLAN |
11 | 2018 | 60*54 | (3.47– 11.07), | 1.26,3.58 | UWB |
13 | 2021 | 60*58 | 3.4–10.2 | 1.46 | UWB |
15 | 2015 | 40*40 | 2.5–12 | 4.2 | UWB |
22 | 2024 | 40*30 | (3.28– 17.8), | 4.93 | UWB, Ku-Band |
23 | 2024 | 15*18 | (4.11–29.77), | 1.7–4.82 | UWB, Ku, Ka-Band |
This work | 2024 | 40*30 | (3.9–12.4), 3.8,7.4,10.6, (6.2–12.5), 6.4,9.7, 2.7, (9.12–11.7) | 6.93, 3.19,4.1,4.95, 5.5, 2.9,4.2, 3, 3.8 | UWB, S,C, X |
