Table 1 Hierarchical regression analysis results for pro-environmental behavior.
Variable | Model1 | Model 2 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | β | p | B | SE | β | p | ||
Control variable | |||||||||
Gender | 0.213 | 0.274 | 0.082 | 0.438 | 0.253 | 0.266 | 0.097 | 0.344 | |
Age | -0.035 | 0.168 | -0.027 | 0.836 | -0.101 | 0.164 | -0.079 | 0.539 | |
Occupation | 0.121 | 0.079 | 0.2 | 0.128 | 0.138 | 0.077 | 0.229 | 0.074 | |
Education level | 0.301 | 0.175 | 0.18 | 0.088 | 0.263 | 0.17 | 0.157 | 0.125 | |
Independent variable | |||||||||
Behavior label | – | 0.262 | 0.096 | 0.267 | 0.008 | ||||
Constant | 3.041 | 0.978 | 0.002 | 1.956 | 1.026 | 0.060 | |||
Model statistics | |||||||||
R2 | 0.067 | 0.136 | |||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.027 | 0.089 | |||||||
F-value | F (4,94) = 1.675 | F (5,93) = 2.924 | |||||||
significance | P = 0.162 | P = 0.017 | |||||||
ΔR2 | – | 0.069 |