Table 2 Comparison of the performance of the five schemes in the first test (170.56 Km).
Schemes |  | RMSE (m, ‰) | Max (m, ‰) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scheme 1 | Horizontal error | 29.05 | 0.170 | 57.02 | 0.334 |
Height error | 20.16 | 0.118 | 37.78 | 0.222 | |
Scheme 2 | Horizontal error | 33.59 | 0.197 | 59.21 | 0.347 |
Height error | 8.18 | 0.048 | 20.98 | 0.123 | |
Scheme 3 | Horizontal error | 26.31 | 0.154 | 50.89 | 0.298 |
Height error | 10.58 | 0.062 | 22.04 | 0.129 | |
Scheme 4 | Horizontal error | 25.23 | 0.148 | 51.49 | 0.302 |
Height error | 9.79 | 0.057 | 18.46 | 0.108 | |
Scheme 5 | Horizontal error | 14.17 | 0.083 | 37.18 | 0.218 |
Height error | 7.40 | 0.043 | 13.87 | 0.081 | |