Table 3 Comparison of the performance of the five schemes in the second test (174.77 Km).
Schemes |  | RMSE (m, ‰) | Max (m, ‰) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scheme 1 | Horizontal error | 8.90 | 0.051 | 18.67 | 0.107 |
Height error | 1.66 | 0.009 | 3.99 | 0.023 | |
Scheme 2 | Horizontal error | 8.96 | 0.051 | 19.08 | 0.109 |
Height error | 0.89 | 0.005 | 2.61 | 0.015 | |
Scheme 3 | Horizontal error | 5.49 | 0.031 | 11.23 | 0.064 |
Height error | 1.23 | 0.007 | 1.83 | 0.010 | |
Scheme 4 | Horizontal error | 5.25 | 0.030 | 10.90 | 0.062 |
Height error | 0.60 | 0.003 | 1.12 | 0.006 | |
Scheme 5 | Horizontal error | 4.70 | 0.027 | 10.17 | 0.058 |
Height error | 0.44 | 0.002 | 1.11 | 0.006 |