Table 4 Summary comparsion.

From: Three-dimensional nanofibrous PCL/gelatin scaffold fabricated using centrifugal force assisted wet electrospinning technique

Study

Key findings & strengths

Main limitations

Our scaffold improvements

Refs.

Hwang et al

Crater-like 2D mats (crater-area porosity 46–52%, superficial infiltration)

Low porosity, poor 3D structure, missing mechanical/cell data

 > 97% volumetric porosity; true 3D nanofibrous structure; fully quantified

74

Bakhtiary et al

SPION-laden wet-spun scaffolds; improved PBS uptake and neural differentiation

No volumetric porosity or kPa mechanical data

Measured porosity, hydration, kPa-range mechanics, and long-term viability

81

Du et al

Enhanced strength, hydrophilicity, ROS scavenging, tissue repair in 2D mats

2D only; no 3D porosity or neural mechanics data

3D structure, > 97% porosity, hydration control, kPa mechanics, 3D integration

82

Perez–Puyana et al

Fiber alignment effects on 2D mechanics

Structural discontinuities, no porosity control, limited infiltration

Open 3D network, high porosity, mechanically tuned, improved cellular use

83