Table 2 List of phantom layers designed for the calcaneal, midfoot, and forefoot regions in healthy and diabetic models.

From: Validation and reliability of mechanical stiffness assessment tools in multilayered polyurethane phantom models of healthy and diabetic plantar soft tissues

Model region

Condition

Thickness (mm)

Shore-OOO

Stiffness variations

V1

V2

V3

Calcaneal model

Plantar skin

Healthy

1.6*

20–56

20

35

56

Plantar fat pad

Healthy

16

20–52

20

35

50

Plantar fascia

Healthy

3

35–47

35

45

50

Calcaneal model

Plantar skin

Diabetic

2

30–62+

30

45

65

Plantar fat pad

Diabetic

16

29–52

30

40

50

Plantar fascia

Diabetic

4

43–53

45

50

55

Midfoot model

Plantar skin

Healthy

0.75 *

39–43

35

40

45

Plantar fat pad

Healthy

7

24–28

20

25

30

Plantar fascia

Healthy

2

34–47

35

45

50

Intrinsic foot muscle

Healthy

10

3–13

10

  

Midfoot model

Plantar skin

Diabetic

0.6*

49–51

50

55

60

Plantar fat pad

Diabetic

4

30–41

30

35

40

Plantar fascia

Diabetic

3

25–38

25

35

40

Intrinsic foot muscle

Diabetic

9

 > 13

20

  

Forefoot model

Plantar skin

Healthy

2.5

44

 

45

 

Plantar fat pad

Healthy

7

23–40

20

30

40

Plantar fascia

Healthy

1

15–34

15

25

35

Intrinsic foot muscle

Healthy

11

6–30

15

20

30

Forefoot model

Plantar skin

Diabetic

1.8

51

 

51

 

Plantar fat pad

Diabetic

8

37–60

35

45

60

Plantar fascia

Diabetic

1

28–46

30

35

45

Intrinsic foot muscle

Diabetic

11

17–27

17

25

30

  1. *Due to technical constraints, 1 mm gel pads were chosen over the 1.6 mm, 0.75 mm, and 0.6 mm alternatives, as production below 1 mm thickness was not feasible.