Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Size dependent efficacy of zinc oxide nanoparticles in zinc biofortification of basmati rice
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 February 2026

Size dependent efficacy of zinc oxide nanoparticles in zinc biofortification of basmati rice

  • Sharan Paranimuthu1,
  • Rakesh Pandey2,
  • Achchhelal Yadav3,
  • Vinutha T. Gowda4,
  • P. Krishnan5,
  • D. K. Sharma6,
  • Vishnu Shankar7,
  • Vidya Madhuri Eere8,
  • Sai Rupali Jagadam9,
  • Rajeev Ranjan10,
  • R. S. Bana11 &
  • …
  • Anup Kumar12 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 201 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Physiology
  • Plant sciences

Abstract

Zinc (Zn) deficiency poses a significant global health concern, particularly in regions where rice is a staple food. Biofortification, the process of enhancing the nutrient content of crops, offers a sustainable solution. This study investigates the potential of soil applied zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) of different sizes (30, 40, and 95 nm) as an alternative to enhance Zn uptake, growth, and grain quality in two popular basmati rice cultivars (Pusa Basmati-1121 and Pusa Basmati-1509). Results showed that ZnO-NPs treatments performed significantly but among the various sizes, the 30 nm ZnO-NPs performed the best and increased the photosynthetic rate by 21.5–23.4%, stomatal conductance by 35.7–38.5%, chlorophyll a, b, and total content by 21.7–47%, and carotenoids by 38.2–46.2% compared to the control. Similarly, the performance of ZnO-NPs was significantly higher for metabolites especially protein, proline, and antioxidant enzymatic activities such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT), particularly  30 nm ZnO-NPs increased the most by 18.1–36% compared to the control. Soil amendment with ZnO-NPs significantly (p < 0.05) improved root length, surface area, volume, and average root diameter compared to the control. Additionally, ZnO-NP treatment increased tillers per hill (46%), productive tillers per hill (25% ), panicle length (5–20%), grain weight per panicle (33.3–36.3%), and yield per hill (29.2–32.1%) over the control, with the 30 nm ZnO-NPs performing the best among the three sizes. Other sizes of NPs (40 and 95 nm) also showed a significant improvement in crop yield attributes. ZnO-NP soil amendment significantly increased Zn density in roots and grains, with the 30 nm nanoparticles resulting in the highest increase (~ 57%) in grain Zn content in both cultivars. Furthermore, soil amended with ZnO-NPs significantly (p < 0.05) reduced phytic acid content in the grains of both rice cultivars. These findings demonstrate that ZnO-NPs, especially in smaller sizes (30 nm), can serve as an effective nano-biofortification strategy, addressing Zn deficiency in rice . The long-term effects of ZnO-NPs on soil health, microbial balance, and nutrient cycling, as well as assessing bioaccumulation risks in ecosystems, could be examined in future studies.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the first author and corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Fukagawa, N. et al. Rice: Importance for global nutrition. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 65, 2–3 (2019).

  2. Rice Almanac Source Book for One of the Most Important Economic Activities on Earth Fourth Edition. (2013). www.ricepedia.org

  3. Zhang, H. The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles for enhancing rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield and quality. Agriculture. 11, (2021).

  4. WHO. Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information. Google Scholar. (2016). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=WHO.+%282016%29.+Vitamin+and+Mineral+Nutrition+Information+System.+World+Health+Organization+&btnG.

  5. Aragie, T. & Genanu, S. Level and determinants of food security in North Wollo zone (Amhara Region – Ethiopia). J. Food Secur. 5, 232–247 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dimkpa, C., food, P. B. J. & of agricultural and & undefined. Nanofertilizers: new products for the industry? J. Agric. Food Chem. 66, 6462–6473 (2017).

  7. Sangeetha, V. J., Dutta, S., Moses, J. A. & Anandharamakrishnan, C. Zinc Nutrition and Human Health: Overview and Implications (Wiley Online Library, 2022).

  8. Khan, S. T., Malik, A., Alwarthan, A. & Shaik, M. R. The enormity of the zinc deficiency problem and available solutions; an overview. Arab. J. Chem. 15, (2022).

  9. Kopittke, P. M., Lombi, E., Wang, P., Schjoerring, J. K. & Husted, S. Nanomaterials as fertilizers for improving plant mineral nutrition and environmental outcomes. Environ. Sci. Nano. 6, 3513 (2019).

  10. Adisa, I. O. et al. Recent advances in nano-enabled fertilizers and pesticides: a critical review of mechanisms of action. Environ. Sci. Nano. 6, 2002–2030 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elmer, W. H. & White, J. C. The use of metallic oxide nanoparticles to enhance growth of tomatoes and eggplants in disease infested soil or soilless medium. Environ. Sci. Nano. 3, 1072–1079 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. War, J. M., Fazili, M. A., Mushtaq, W., Wani, A. H. & Bhat, M. Y. Role of nanotechnology in crop improvement. Nanatechnol. Life Sci. 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39978-8_4 (2020).

  13. Zain, M. et al. Nanotechnology in precision agriculture: advancing towards sustainable crop production. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 206, (2024).

  14. Shehzadi, N. Zinc and nitrogen mediate the regulation of growth, leading to the upregulation of antioxidant aptitude, physio-biochemical traits, and yield in wheat plants. Sci. Rep. 14, 12897 (2022).

  15. Seydmohammadi, Z., Roein, Z. & Reports, S. R. P. P. (eds) Accelerating the growth and flowering of Eustoma grandiflorum by foliar application of nano-ZnO and nano-CaCO3. Plant Physiol. Rep. 25, 140–148 (2020).

  16. Yadav, A. et al. Zinc oxide and ferric oxide nanoparticles combination increase plant growth, yield, and quality of soybean under semiarid region. Chemosphere. 352, (2024).

  17. Hussain, M. et al. Zinc-oxide nanoparticles ameliorated the phytotoxic hazards of cadmium toxicity in maize plants by regulating primary metabolites and antioxidants activity. Front. Plant. Sci 15, (2024).

  18. Koleník, M. et al. Effect of foliar spray application of zinc oxide nanoparticles on quantitative, nutritional, and physiological parameters of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) under Field. Nanomaterials. 9, (2019).

  19. Zhang, T. Using synchrotron-based approaches to examine the foliar application of ZnSO4 and ZnO nanoparticles for field-grown winter wheat. ACS Publ. 66, 2572–2579 (2017).

  20. Naseer, I. et al. Deciphering the role of zinc oxide nanoparticles on physiochemical attributes of Zea Mays exposed to saline conditions through modulation in antioxidant enzyme defensive system. South. Afr. J. Bot. 160, 469–482 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rout, G. & Science, S. S. R. in A. & undefined. Role of iron in plant growth and metabolism. Rev. Agric. Sci. 3, 1–24 (2015).

  22. Wahab, A. et al. Interactions of metal-based engineered nanoparticles with plants: an overview of the state of current knowledge, research progress, and prospects. J. Plant. Growth Regul.. 42, 5396–5416 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wahab, A. et al. Effect of foliar ZnO and FeO nanoparticles application on growth and nutritional quality of red radish and assessment of their accumulation on human health. Agriculture 65, 16–29 (2019).

  24. Rameshraddy et al. Zinc oxide nano particles increases Zn uptake, translocation in rice with positive effect on growth, yield and moisture stress tolerance. Indian J. Plant. Physiol. 22, 287–294 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Swapnil, P. et al. Vital roles of carotenoids in plants and humans to deteriorate stress with its structure, biosynthesis, metabolic engineering and functional aspects. Curr. Plant. Biol. 26, (2021).

  26. El-Aziz, G. A., et al. Positive and negative environmental effect of using zinc oxide nanoparticles on wheat under drought stress.Open J. Appl. Sci. 12, 1026–1044 (2019).

  27. Duhan, J. S. et al. Nanotechnology: the new perspective in precision agriculture. Biotechnol. Rep. 15, 11–23 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leopold, L. F. et al. The effect of 100–200 Nm ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles on the in vitro-grown soybean plants. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 216, (2022).

  29. Yang, G. et al. Effect of ZnO nanoparticles on the productivity, Zn biofortification, and nutritional quality of rice in a life cycle study. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 163, 87–94 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mukherjee, A. et al. Differential toxicity of bare and hybrid ZnO nanoparticles in green pea (Pisum sativum L.): A life cycle study. Front. Plant. Sci. 6, (2016).

  31. Jabri, H., Al, Saleem, M., Rizwan, M., Hussain, I. & Usman, K. Zinc oxide nanoparticles and their biosynthesis: overview. Life. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/12/4/594 (2022).

  32. Rahmani, F., Peymani, A., Daneshvand, E. & Biparva, P. Impact of zinc oxide and copper oxide nano-particles on physiological and molecular processes in Brassica napus L. Indian J. Plant. Physiol. 21, 122–128 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Raliya, R. et al. ZnO Nanoparticle biosynthesis and its effect on phosphorous-mobilizing enzyme secretion and gum contents in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). Agric. Res. 2, 48–57 (2013).

  34. Shirvani-Naghani, S., Fallah, S., Raj, L. P. & Rostamnejadi, A. Drought stress mitigation and improved yield in Glycine max through foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 14, (2024).

  35. Basit, F. et al. Application of zinc oxide nanoparticles immobilizes the chromium uptake in rice plants by regulating the physiological, biochemical and cellular attributes. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants. 28, 1175–1190 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thabet, S. et al. Unraveling the role of nanoparticles in improving plant resilience under environmental stress condition. Plant Soil. 503, 313–330 (2024).

  37. Singh, A., Sengar, R., Rajput, V., Minkina, T. & Singh, R. Zinc oxide nanoparticles improve salt tolerance in rice seedlings by improving physiological and biochemical indices. Agriculture. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/1014 (2022).

  38. Nassar, M. et al. Phytic acid: properties and potential applications in dentistry. Front. Mater. 8, (2021).

  39. Kang, M. Driving role of zinc oxide nanoparticles with different sizes and hydrophobicity in metabolic response and eco-corona formation in sprouts (Vigna radiata). Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 9875–9886 (2024).

  40. Madlala, N. C., Khanyile, N. & Masenya, A. Examining the correlation between the inorganic Nano-Fertilizer physical properties and their impact on crop performance and nutrient uptake efficiency. Nanomaterials 2024. 14, 1263 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mazhar, Z. Efficacy of ZnO nanoparticles in Zn fortification and partitioning of wheat and rice grains under salt stress. Sci. Rep. 13. (2022).

  42. Nongbet, A. et al. Role of nanoparticles to protect plants from abiotic stress by scavenging reactive oxygen species. Nanatechnol. Abiotic Stress Tolerance Manage. Crop Plants. 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18500-7.00006-5 (2024).

  43. Guardiola-Márquez, C. E. et al. Development and evaluation of zinc and iron nanoparticles functionalized with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and microalgae for their application as bio-nanofertilizers. Plants (Basel) 12, (2023).

  44. Naik, S. & Agroecosystems, D. D. N. C. Relative performance of chelated zinc and zinc sulphate for lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Nutrient Cycl. Agroecosyst. 81, 219–227 (2008).

  45. Singh, A., Sengar, R. S., Rajput, V. D., Minkina, T. & Singh, R. K. Zinc oxide nanoparticles improve salt tolerance in rice seedlings by improving physiological and biochemical indices. Agriculture (Switzerland). 12, (2022).

  46. Mi, K. et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles enhanced rice yield, quality, and zinc content of edible grain fraction synergistically. Front. Plant. Sci. 14, (2023).

  47. Da Cruz, T. N. M. et al. A new glance on root-to-shoot in vivo zinc transport and time-dependent physiological effects of ZnSO4 and ZnO nanoparticles on plants. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46796-3 (2019).

  48. Khampuang, K., Lordkaew, S. & Dell, B. & Prom-u-thai, C. Foliar zinc application improved grain zinc accumulation and bioavailable zinc in unpolished and polished rice. Plant Prod. Sci. 24, 94–102 (2020).

  49. Wang, S. et al. Foliar spraying of ZnO nanoparticles enhanced the yield, quality, and zinc enrichment of rice grains. Foods. 12, (2023).

  50. Chen, J. et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles enhance grain yield and nutritional quality in rice via improved photosynthesis and zinc bioavailability. Foods. (2025).

  51. Talam, S. et al. Synthesis, characterization, and spectroscopic properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Int. Sch. Res. Notices 2012, 1–6 (2012).

  52. Milani, N. et al. Dissolution kinetics of macronutrient fertilizers coated with manufactured zinc oxide nanoparticles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 60, 3991–3998 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Elshayb, O. M., Farroh, K. Y., Amin, H. E. & Atta, A. M. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles: fortification for rice grain yield and nutrients uptake enhancement. Molecules 26, 584 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lindsay, W. et al. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Wiley Online Libr. 42, 421–428 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Physiology, A. W.-J. The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. Elsevier (1994). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176161711811922

  56. Lowry, O. H. & Randall, R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. & Teare, I. D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant. Soil. 39, 205–207 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Narwal, S. S. Plant Biochemistry (Studium Press, 2009).

  59. Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pelletier, S. et al. Drying procedures affect non-structural carbohydrates and other nutritive value attributes in forage samples. Elsevier 157, 139–150 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jackson, M. L. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice. - Google Scholar (1973). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Jackson%2C+M.+L.+%281973%29.

  62. Carneiro, J. M. T., Zagatto, E. A. G., Santos, J. L. M. & Lima, J. L. F. C. Spectrophotometric determination of phytic acid in plant extracts using a multi-pumping flow system. Anal. Chim. Acta. 474, 161–166 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Vaintraub, I. A. & Lapteva, N. A. Colorimetric determination of phytate in unpurified extracts of seeds and the products of their processing. Anal. Biochem. 175, 227–230 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their sincere thanks to the Director of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, for permitting them to conduct the study. Authors also extend their sincere thanks to Dr. Bhupinder Singh, Division of Environmental Sciences, Dr. Monika Kundu, Division of Agricultural Physics, and Dr. Shruti Sethi, Division of Post-Harvest Technology, for their support in conducting experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Sharan Paranimuthu

  2. Division of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Rakesh Pandey

  3. Division of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Achchhelal Yadav

  4. Division of Plant Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Vinutha T. Gowda

  5. Division of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    P. Krishnan

  6. Division of Environmental Sciences, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    D. K. Sharma

  7. Department of Physical Sciences and Information Technology, Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, 641003, India

    Vishnu Shankar

  8. Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Vidya Madhuri Eere

  9. Division of Entomology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Sai Rupali Jagadam

  10. Division of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Rajeev Ranjan

  11. Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    R. S. Bana

  12. Division of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Anup Kumar

Authors
  1. Sharan Paranimuthu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rakesh Pandey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Achchhelal Yadav
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vinutha T. Gowda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Krishnan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. K. Sharma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vishnu Shankar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Vidya Madhuri Eere
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sai Rupali Jagadam
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rajeev Ranjan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. R. S. Bana
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Anup Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.P. carried out experiment, data acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data, drafting original article; R.P. conception of the work, methodology, interpretation of data; A.Y. conception and framing of the work, methodology, drafting original article; V.T.G. methodology, formal data analysis, P.K. conception of the work, methodology, interpretation of data, revision of original draft; D.K.S. interpretation of data; V.S. data analysis; E.V.M. formal analysis, revision of original draft, J.S.R. formal analysis, revision of original draft, R.R. - formal analysis, reviewing, R.S.B. interpretation of data, reviewing and A.K. data handling.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achchhelal Yadav.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paranimuthu, S., Pandey, R., Yadav, A. et al. Size dependent efficacy of zinc oxide nanoparticles in zinc biofortification of basmati rice. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30827-3

Download citation

  • Received: 14 May 2025

  • Accepted: 27 November 2025

  • Published: 16 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30827-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Biofortification
  • Antioxidant enzymes
  • Size-dependent
  • Phytic acid
  • Soil application
  • Root morphology
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing