Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Pan centromeric FISH enhances precision in radiation biodosimetry
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 February 2026

Pan centromeric FISH enhances precision in radiation biodosimetry

  • Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia1,
  • Aarti Notnani1,
  • Devina Fenilon Vaz1,
  • Kapil B. Shirsath1,
  • Sheeri Fatima2,
  • Nagesh N. Bhat1,3,
  • Arshad Khan1,
  • Dhruv Kumar2 &
  • …
  • Balvinder K. Sapra1,3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 283 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Biophysics
  • Health care
  • Health occupations

Abstract

Accurate biodosimetry is critical for assessing radiation exposure in radiological emergencies, occupational monitoring, and clinical management, where precise dose estimation informs life-saving decisions and regulatory compliance. Current gold-standard cytogenetic methods face limitations in sensitivity and reproducibility, especially at low doses (< 0.5 Gy) (practical limitations at low doses, including very low dicentric yields, higher statistical noise, and greater scoring uncertainty as aberration frequencies near background levels). This study presents a systematic comparison of pan-centromeric fluorescence in situ hybridization (pan-cent-FISH) and Giemsa staining for detecting dicentric (DC) and ring (R) chromosomes following 60Co-γ irradiation (0–3 Gy). Analysis of more than 15,000 metaphases per technique revealed enhanced sensitivity of pan-cent-FISH technique, demonstrating a 1.72-fold higher linear coefficient and enhanced (1.13-fold) quadratic coefficient (β), indicating improved sensitivity across both low and high dose ranges. Blind validation with eight samples showed pan-cent-FISH achieved ~ 2-fold greater accuracy, with mean absolute differences of 0.0538 Gy (vs. 0.1105 Gy for Giemsa) and average relative errors of 7.13% (vs. 15.35% for Giemsa). At low doses (0.1 Gy), pan-cent-FISH maintained 9.0% error, while Giemsa exceeded acceptable limits (21.0% error). The standardized fluorescence detection used for the technique eliminated morphological ambiguities, reducing false negatives by ~ 40% and improving first-pass accuracy.

Data availability

All data generated in this study are included in the article. Additional data supporting the findings are available from the corresponding author (Email ID: nageshnb@barc.gov.in), upon reasonable request.

References

  1. IAEA. Cytogenetic Dosimetry: Applications in Preparedness for and Response to Radiation Emergencies (IAEA, 2011).

  2. ISO. ISO 19238:2023 Radiological Protection—Performance Criteria for Service Laboratories Performing Biological Dosimetry by Cytogenetics - Dicentric Assay (International Organization for Standardization, 2023).

  3. de Lemos Pinto, M. M. P., Santos, N. F. G. & Amaral, A. Current status of biodosimetry based on standard cytogenetic methods. Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 49, 567–581 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benkhaled, L. et al. Analysis of γ-rays induced chromosome aberrations: A fingerprint evaluation with a combination of pan-centromeric and pan-telomeric probes. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 82 (12), 869–875 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M’kacher, R. et al. New Tool for Biological Dosimetry: Reevaluation and Automation of the Gold Standard Method Following Telomere and Centromere Staining, vol. 770, 45–53 (Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2014).

  6. Rothkamm, K. et al. Comparison of established and emerging biodosimetry assays. Radiat. Res. 180 (2), 111–119 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bauchinger, M. et al. Collaborative exercise on the use of FISH chromosome painting for retrospective biodosimetry of Mayak nuclear-industrial personnel. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 77 (3), 259–267 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M’Kacher, R. et al. High resolution and automatable cytogenetic biodosimetry using in situ telomere and centromere hybridization for the accurate detection of DNA damage: An overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24(6), 5699 (2023).

  9. M’kacher, R. et al. Detection and automated scoring of dicentric chromosomes in nonstimulated lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes after telomere and centromere staining. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 91 (3), 640–649 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandes, T. S., Lloyd, D. & Amaral, A. A comparison of different cytological stains for biological dosimetry. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 84 (8), 703–711 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lindholm, C., Salomaa, S. & Tekkel, M. Biodosimetry after accidental radiation exposure by conventional chromosome analysis of FISH. Occup. Health Ind. Med. 3(36), 105 (1997).

  12. Escalona, M. B., Ryan, T. L. & Balajee, A. S. Current developments in biodosimetry tools for radiological/nuclear mass casualty incidents. Environ. Adv. 9, 100265 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bhavani, M. et al. Dicentric chromosome aberration analysis using Giemsa and centromere specific fluorescence in-situ hybridization for biological dosimetry: an inter-and intra-laboratory comparison in Indian laboratories. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 92, 85–90 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vijayalakshmi, J. et al. Establishment of ex vivo calibration curve for X-ray induced dicentric + ring and micronuclei in human peripheral lymphocytes for biodosimetry during radiological emergencies, and validation with dose blinded samples. Heliyon. 9(6). (2023).

  15. Chaurasia, R. K. et al. FISH unveils a unified method for multi-marker biodose assessment. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 16994 (2025).

  16. Chaurasia, R. K. et al. First evidence of coexistence of Pseudo Pelger Huet anomaly and balanced translocation in a two decades retrospectively exposed human subject. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 29292 (2025).

  17. Ainsbury, E. A. & Lloyd, D. C. Dose estimation software for radiation biodosimetry. Health Phys. 98 (2), 290–295 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Romm, H., Oestreicher, U. & Kulka, U. Cytogenetic damage analyzed by the dicentric assay. Ann. ICRP. 42 (1_suppl), 144–152 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Romm, H. et al. Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents. Mutat. Res./Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 756 (1–2), 174–183 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marsh, J. W., Tomášek, L., Laurier, D. & Harrison, J. D. Effective dose coefficients for radon and progeny: a review of ICRP and UNSCEAR values. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 195 (1), 1–20 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vaurijoux, A. et al. Strategy for population triage based on dicentric analysis. Radiat. Res. 171 (5), 541–548 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schunck, C., Johannes, T., Varga, D., Lörch, T. & Plesch, A. New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 104 (1–4), 383–389 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chaurasia, R. K., Shirsath, K. B., Desai, U. N., Bhat, N. N. & Sapra, B. K. Establishment of in vitro calibration curve for 60Co-γ-rays induced phospho-53BP1 foci, rapid biodosimetry and initial triage, and comparative evaluations with γH2AX and cytogenetic assays. Front. Public Health. 10, 845200 (2022).

  24. Chaurasia, R. K. et al. Establishment and multiparametric-cytogenetic Validation of 60Co-gamma-ray induced, phospho-gamma-H2AX Calibration Curve for rapid biodosimetry and triage management during radiological emergencies. Mutat. Res./Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutag. 866, 503354 (2021).

  25. Chaurasia, D. R. K. et al. Strengthening radiation response and expanding cytogenetic applications: Indian Biodosimetry Network (IN-BioDoS). J. Radiol. Prot. (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors deeply appreciate the valuable assistance and technical support provided by Mr. Shrikant Jagtap and the lab’s technical staff.

Funding

This work was supported by the institutional fund of the host institute (BARC, Mumbai, India). No external funding was involved in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Mumbai, India

    Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, Aarti Notnani, Devina Fenilon Vaz, Kapil B. Shirsath, Nagesh N. Bhat, Arshad Khan & Balvinder K. Sapra

  2. School of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun, India

    Sheeri Fatima & Dhruv Kumar

  3. Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India

    Nagesh N. Bhat & Balvinder K. Sapra

Authors
  1. Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aarti Notnani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Devina Fenilon Vaz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kapil B. Shirsath
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sheeri Fatima
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nagesh N. Bhat
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Arshad Khan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dhruv Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Balvinder K. Sapra
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.K.C., A.N., D.F.V., K.B.S., S.F. and N.N.B.: Conceptualization, methodology, data curation and writing; B.K.S., A.K., D.K.: Review, editing, supervision and resources.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nagesh N. Bhat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval for this study’s research proposal was granted by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Mumbai, India. The project was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the declaration. Informed ethical consent was obtained from the participating human volunteer following a comprehensive explanation of the project.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to publish the manuscript in its present form.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaurasia, R.K., Notnani, A., Vaz, D.F. et al. Pan centromeric FISH enhances precision in radiation biodosimetry. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34407-3

Download citation

  • Received: 13 May 2025

  • Accepted: 29 December 2025

  • Published: 10 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34407-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Biodosimetry
  • Pan-centromeric FISH
  • Cytogenetic biodosimetry
  • Dose-response curves
  • Radiological emergencies
  • Chromosomal aberrations
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research