Table 6 The values in brackets represent percentage of cases according to the original pulp status, presence/absence of periapical lesions and types of sealers.

From: Clinical and radiographic outcome of a bioceramic sealer compared to a resin-based sealer: a retrospective study

Type of RCTs %

Pulp tissues status

Type of sealer

Outcome of RCT upon recall (%)

Successful outcome

Unsuccessful outcome

Total

Primary RCTs [89.5]

Vital pulp [29]

Adseal [36.1]

26 (100)

0 (0)

26 (100)

TotalFill [63.9]

44 (95.7)

2 (4.3)

46 (100)

Total [100]

70 (97.2)

2 (2.8)

72 (100)

Necrotic pulp [60.5]

Adseal [42.7]

61 (95.3)

3 (4.7)

64 (100)

TotalFill [57.3]

81 (94.2)

5 (5.8)

86 (100)

Total [100]

142 (94.7)

8 (5.3)

150 (100)

Previous RCTs [10.5]

Adseal [80.8]

21 (100)

0 (0)

21 (100)

TotalFill [19.2]

5 (100)

0 (0)

5 (100)

Total [100]

26 (100)

0 (0)

26 (100)

Total [100]

238 (96)

10 (4)

248 (100)

Total [100]

Presence of periapical lesion

Type of sealer

Outcome of RCT Upon recall (%)

 

Successful outcome

Unsuccessful outcome

Total

 

With apical lesion [48.8]

Adseal [52.9]

62 (96.9)

2 (3.1)

64 (100)

 

TotalFill [47.1]

54 (94.7)

3 (5.3)

57 (100)

 

Total [100]

116 (95.9)

5 (4.1)

121 (100)

 

Without apical lesion [51.2]

Adseal [37]

46 (97.9)

1 (2.1)

47 (100)

 

TotalFill [63]

122 (96.1)

5 (3.9)

127 (100)

 

Total [100]

130 (94.9)

7 (5.1)

137 (100)

 

Total [100]

238 (96)

10 (4)

248 (100)