Table 3 Comparative cost analysis for different cases with existing literature.
Optimization algorithm | Ref. | (A/TOU) | (P/TOU) | Without RES | (A/FP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | ||
PSO | 889 | - | 1709 | - | |
DE | 886 | - | 1704 | - | |
DEGL | 883 | - | 1703 | - | |
GWO | 1086 | - | 1803 | - | |
MGWO | 1049 | - | 1746.5 | - | |
MGWOSCACSA | 882.5 | - | 1701.5 | - | |
CSAJAYA | 880.95 | 989.77 | 1699.2 | 939.16 | |
CSAJAYA with 5% DSM | 859.5 | 955.31 | 1680.5 | 932.46 | |
CSAJAYA with 10% DSM | 842.1 | 934.71 | 1661.5 | 929.45 | |
CSAJAYA with 15% DSM | 823.15 | 914.11 | 1640.5 | 926.8 | |
CSAJAYA with 20% DSM | 807.2 | 897.36 | 1621.2 | 925.66 | |
CSAJAYA with DR | 871.9796 | 976.0604 | 1687.2141 | Not Applicable | |
GRSO (Base load demand) | Proposed work | 882 | 989 | 1701 | 939 |
GRSO (limited grid operation) | 948 | 1055 | 1800 | 977 | |
GRSO with CPP based LP | 746 | 856 | 1553 | 802 | |
GRSO with TOU based LP | 775 | 881 | 1568 | 827 | |
GRSO with RTP based LP | 863 | 972 | 1680 | 921 | |
GRSO with logarithmic LP | 765 | 817 | 1551 | 836 | |
GRSO with exponential LP | 843 | 943 | 1663 | 905 | |
GRSO with hyperbolic LP | 882 | 989 | 1705 | 938 |
