Table 6 Logistic regression analysis between eGDR and gallstone prevalence in the sensitivity analysis.

From: Body Mass Index mediates the relationship between estimated glucose disposal rate and gallstones

Characteristic

Model 1 OR (95%CI)

Model 2 OR (95%CI)

Model 3 OR (95%CI)

eGDR

0.82 (0.78,0.85)

0.83 (0.78,0.87)

0.93 (0.87,1.00)

Categories

≤ 4 mg/kg/min

1.0

1.0

1.0

4–6 mg/kg/min

0.62 (0.45,0.84)

0.54 (0.39,0.75)

0.84 (0.59,1.19)

6–8 mg/kg/min

0.38 (0.27,0.55)

0.34 (0.23,0.49)

0.61 (0.41,0.91)

> 8 mg/kg/min

0.24 (0.18,0.33)

0.26 (0.18,0.38)

0.66 (0.43,1.01)

Categories

Q1

1.0

1.0

1.0

Q2

0.52 (0.39,0.70)

0.49 (0.36,0.66)

0.74 (0.53,1.03)

Q3

0.37 (0.28,0.49)

0.41 (0.30,0.55)

0.69 (0.49,0.99)

Q4

0.23 (0.15,0.34)

0.27 (0.17,0.43)

0.72 (0.40,1.27)

  1. Model 1 was adjusted for no covariates; Model 2 was adjusted for age, gender, and race; Model 3 was adjusted for covariates in Model 2 + education, smoked, alcohol, physical activity, asthma, CHD, cancers, PIR, ALT, AST, TC, HDL and BMI were adjusted.