Table 2 Lesion factors associated with false-positive results in screening mammogram.

From: Factors associated with false-positive screening mammography in São Paulo, Brazil

Factors related to lesion¹

True-positives

False-positives

Multivariate analysis ²

N (%)

N (%)

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

Type

Calcifications

365 (8.4)

2329 (42)

3.4 (2.9–4.0)

Solid-Cyst

1331 (30.5)

1902 (34.3)

1.1 (0.8–1.4)

Cyst

4 (0.1)

414 (7.5)

1.8 (1.0–2.9)

Solid nodule

2663 (61)

899 (16.2)

[Reference]

Edges

Defined

371 (17.8)

1982 (90)

2.4 (1.9–3.2)

Undefined

1719 (82.2)

219 (10)

[Reference]

Missing values

2273

3343

-

Characteristics

Irregular

3458 (86.8)

4192 (85.2)

0.9 (0.4–1.6)

Regular

528 (13.2)

728 (14.8)

[Reference]

Missing

377

624

-

Size

≤ 10 mm

1016 (23.3)

3577 (64.5)

3.8 (3.4–4.3)

11–20 mm

2358 (54)

1203 (21.7)

0.5 (0.1–1.6)

> 20 mm

989 (22.7)

764 (13.8)

[Reference]

Topographic site

Lateral upper quadrant

1111 (40.4)

1421 (41.9)

-

Lateral lower quadrant

194 (7.1)

241 (7.1)

-

Medial upper quadrant

247 (9)

328 (9.7)

-

Medial lower quadrant

117 (4.3)

168 (5)

-

Union of lateral quadrants

232 (8.4)

268 (7.9)

-

Union of upper quadrants

250 (9.1)

292 (8.6)

-

Union of medial quadrants

86 (3.1)

135 (4)

-

Union of lower quadrants

122 (4.4)

114 (3.4)

-

Axillary extension

113 (4.1)

114 (3.4)

-

Retro areolar region

278 (10.1)

311 (9.2)

-

Missing

1613

2152

 
  1. 1The lesions model (model 2) included the variables: lesion type, lesion boundaries, and lesion characteristics, and lesion size.
  2. 2Estimated by logistic regression models and considering the true-positive results as the reference category.
  3. The symbol “-” means that no measure of odds ratio was generated since the variables/categories were not included in the logistic regression models.