Table 4 Characterization of traditional village types under different clustering methods.
From: Multi-scale comparison of the formation mechanisms in landscape genes of traditional villages
Indicators | k-modes | k-prototypes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | |
Terrain | Mountain | Hill | Plain | Hill | Mountain | Hill | Plain | Hill |
River System | Huai River System | Hai River System | Hai River System | Yellow River System | Huai River System | Hai River System | Hai River System | Hai River System |
Settlement Distribution | Clustered | Clustered | Clustered | Clustered | Clustered | Clustered | Clustered | Clustered |
Road Network | Grid | Fishbone | Fishbone | Fishbone | Grid/Fishbone | Fishbone | Fishbone | Fishbone |
Residential Style | Mixed | Complete Retention | Complete Retention | Basic Retention | Mixed | Complete Retention | Complete Retention | Basic Retention |
Architectural Pattern | Clump | Clump | Line | Clump | Clump | Clump | Line | Clump |
Indicators | k-modes | – | ||||||
Type 1 | Type 2 | Type 3 | Type 4 | |||||
Elevation | 293.24 | 336.03 | 311.24 | 782.12 | 274.32 | 387.58 | 563.63 | 385.83 |
Distance to River | 6345.34 | 11,432.42 | 6227.25 | 9205.97 | 7735.53 | 10,963.71 | 19,026.14 | 2546.55 |
Shape Index | 2.74 | 4.64 | 2.83 | 3.18 | 3.08 | 3.25 | 3.62 | 3.20 |
Fractal Dimension | 1.07 | 1.16 | 1.08 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.10 | 1.12 | 1.09 |
Farness | 110.59 | 128.39 | 118.80 | 312.53 | 125.37 | 144.45 | 192.70 | 138.93 |
Connection | 0.51 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.41 |
Betweenness | 0.55 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.46 |
Mixing Degree | 0.19 | 0.40 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.38 |
Area Consistency | 0.71 | 0.70 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.70 |
Distance Consistency | 2.83 | 2.45 | 1.82 | 1.89 | 2.33 | 2.00 | 2.76 | 2.44 |
Angle Consistency | 1.82 | 1.14 | 1.27 | 1.13 | 1.59 | 1.25 | 1.04 | 1.50 |
