Table 8 Statistical analysis table.
From: Double weighted combat data quality evaluation method based on CVF optimized FAHP
Comparison of methods | Pearson correlation coefficient | Spearman correlation coefficient | Significance | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FAHP-CVF and BPNN | 0.9707 | 0.9286 | 6.1774*10− 5 | 0.4578 |
FAHP-CVF and FAHP | 0.9992 | 1.0000 | 1.2697*10− 9 | 4.2422*10− 4 |
FAHP-CVF and MDM | 0.9533 | 0.9762 | 2.4633*10− 4 | 0.0968 |
